Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2026

07:20
Observing the Transformation of Bodily Self-consciousness in the Squeeze-machine Experiment
Published on: March 8, 2019
The society of selves
1Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, UK. n.humphrey@lse.ac.uk
Summary
Humans are uniquely aware of self and others, facing the philosophical "other minds" problem. Understanding consciousness
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary Psychology
- Philosophy of Mind
- Cognitive Science
Background:
- Humans exhibit unparalleled sociability, yet grapple with the concept of individual conscious selfhood.
- The philosophical 'problem of other minds' highlights the inherent difficulty in understanding subjective experiences of others.
- The evolutionary origins and adaptive functions of consciousness privacy remain largely unexplored.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore the evolutionary history and potential adaptive functions of the privacy of consciousness.
- To examine the implications of psychic opacity in the context of human social cognition and self-awareness.
- To consider the benefits and consequences of limited psychic transparency in social interactions.
Main Methods:
- Philosophical analysis of consciousness and selfhood.
- Review of evolutionary psychology principles.
- Theoretical consideration of social cognition and intersubjectivity.
Main Results:
- The privacy of consciousness has a discernible evolutionary trajectory.
- Psychic opacity may serve crucial evolutionary functions, despite the importance of mind-reading.
- Understanding the benefits of limited psychic transparency offers new perspectives on social dynamics.
Conclusions:
- The inherent privacy of subjective experience is a product of evolutionary processes.
- While mind-reading is vital, complete psychic transparency may not be evolutionarily advantageous.
- Further research into the adaptive value of psychic opacity is warranted.
Related Concept Videos
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
According to Charles Cooley, we base our image on what we think other people see (Cooley 1902). We imagine how we must appear to others, then react to this speculation. We don certain clothes, prepare our hair in a particular manner, wear makeup, use cologne, and the like—all with the notion that our presentation of ourselves is going to affect how others perceive us. We expect a certain reaction, and, if lucky, we get the one we desire and feel good about it. But more than that, Cooley...
Social Foundations of Self IV: Self in Digital Communication
Since the early 2000s, computer-mediated communication (CMC) has grown rapidly, playing a crucial role in self-development. A key distinction between CMC and real-life interactions is the lack of a physically present partner. This absence makes non-verbal cues such as facial expressions, body language, and paralinguistic signals unavailable in CMC platforms like email, instant messaging, or social media. The lack of these cues can create ambiguity and complicate how feedback is interpreted.The...
Social Foundations of Self I: Play and Game
The development of self in children is deeply rooted in social interactions, mainly through stages of play and structured games. These stages, outlined by sociologist George Herbert Mead, illustrate how children progressively learn to understand and adopt social roles, forming a cohesive sense of self.The Play Stage: Imitation and Simple Role-TakingIn the early years of childhood, the play stage is characterized by imitative behavior, where children engage in role-playing based on familiar...
The Looking Glass Self
The concept of the looking-glass self describes how an individual's self-concept is shaped by their perception of how others see them. This psychological theory, first introduced by sociologist Charles Horton Cooley in 1902, posits that self-identity emerges in a social context and is influenced by the judgments—real or imagined—of others.Research suggests that individuals frequently overestimate how positively others perceive them. This is particularly evident in physical self-perception,...
Self-Schemas
In general, a schema is a mental construct consisting of a cluster or collection of related concepts (Bartlett, 1932). There are many different types of schemata, and they all have one thing in common: schemata are a method of organizing information that allows the brain to work more efficiently. When a schema is activated, the brain makes immediate assumptions about the person or object being observed.
Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other
According to George Herbert Mead, as children progress beyond the game stage, they develop a more comprehensive understanding of societal rules and norms. This cognitive and social development enables them to internalize the expectations of the broader community, refining their ability to regulate behavior.Consistent participation in organized activities is crucial in helping children recognize that their actions are not isolated but contribute to a more significant, interconnected group effort.

