[Proposed terms for endobronchial lesions in patients suspected of having a bronchial neoplasm]

Endoscopists describe lung cancer lesions using varying terminology. This study aimed to assess the probability of neoplastic disease in terms of endoscopic findings expressed in an original classification system. The endoscopic lesions were classified as infiltrations (superficial lesions without a clear border with normal mucosa) or masses (exophytic lesions easily distinguished from the bronchial wall). Each lesion was categorized according to 3 grades reflecting probability of malignancy. A grade I infiltration was a lesion presenting 1 of the following characteristics: loss of luster, increased thickness, or redness, with a smooth surface. A grade II infiltration presented 2 of the aforementioned characteristics, with a rough surface. A grade III infiltration presented 3 of those characteristics. A grade I mass was an exophytic lesion with a smooth surface, uniformly colored. A grade II mass presented a smooth surface of a distinct color, and a grade III mass had a rough surface and irregular coloring. We assessed 377 patients with suspicion of neoplasm. Twenty-three percent of the infiltrations were grade I carcinomas, 74% were grade II, and 95% were grade III. Twenty-three percent of masses were grade I, 77% were grade II, and 97% were grade III. The probability of malignancy increased significantly with grade (P< .001) for both types of lesion. In summary, there is a positive correlation between the terms used and the probability of carcinoma. Most grade III lesions were carcinomas, but apparently innocuous grade I lesions could be carcinomas in a significant number of cases.