Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2026
Surgical Angiogenesis in Porcine Tibial Allotransplantation: A New Large Animal Bone Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation Model
Published on: August 13, 2017
Comparison of alendronate vs alendronate plus mechanical loading as prophylaxis for osteoporosis in lung transplant
Randy W Braith1, Jill A Conner, Michael N Fulton
1Department of Applied Physiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA. rbraith@hhp.ufl.edu
Background:
Osteoporosis is known to complicate outcomes after lung transplantation (Tx).
Methods:
To determine the efficacy of bisphosphonate therapy combined with the osteogenic stimulus of mechanical loading, 30 lung transplant recipients (LTRs) were randomly assigned either to alendronate (10 mg/day; n = 10), alendronate (10 mg/day) + resistance exercise (n = 10) or to a control group (n = 10). Alendronate was initiated at 7 days after Tx. Bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry before and 2 and 8 months after Tx. Resistance training was initiated at 2 months after Tx and consisted of lumbar extension exercise performed 1 day/week for 6 months.
Results:
Lumbar BMD decreased significantly to below pre-transplant baseline at 2 months after Tx in controls (-12.5 +/- 2.1%), but not in the alendronate (1.5 +/- 1.2%) or alendronate + training (1.5 +/- 0.9%) groups. At 8 months after Tx, lumbar BMD in controls was 14.1 +/- 3.9% below baseline (p < or = 0.05), but was 1.4 +/- 1.1% above baseline in alendronate recipients (p > or = 0.05). The alendronate + training group showed a significantly increased lumbar BMD with values 10.8 +/- 2.3% greater than before Tx.
Conclusions:
These results suggest that resistance exercise plus alendronate is more effective than alendronate alone in restoring BMD. Anti-osteoporosis therapy in LTRs should include both an anti-resorptive agent and an osteogenic stimulus, such as mechanical loading.
