Related Experiment Videos
A cluster randomised controlled trial of the effect of a treatment algorithm for hypertension in patients with type 2
Charlotte Bebb1, Denise Kendrick, Carol Coupland
1Renal Unit, City Hospital Campus, Nottingham University Hospitals, Hucknall Road, Nottingham. charlotte.bebb@nuh.nhs.uk
Insights
A blood pressure (BP) treatment algorithm did not improve BP control in type 2 diabetes patients in primary care. Increased monitoring and medication did not lead to better outcomes, suggesting specialist care improvements may not transfer to primary settings.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Endocrinology
- Primary Care Medicine
Background:
- Effective blood pressure (BP) control is crucial for reducing complications in type 2 diabetes patients.
- Many individuals with type 2 diabetes struggle to achieve recommended BP targets.
- Current hypertension management guidelines advocate for escalating antihypertensive medications, but their effectiveness in routine primary care is not well-established.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the efficacy of a structured BP treatment algorithm for managing hypertension in primary care patients with type 2 diabetes.
- To compare the outcomes of an algorithm-guided approach versus usual care in this patient population.
Main Methods:
- A cluster randomized controlled trial involving 1534 patients with type 2 diabetes across 42 UK primary care practices.
- Practices were randomized to either usual care or an intervention group utilizing a BP treatment algorithm.
- The algorithm guided practice nurses and GPs in escalating antihypertensive therapy to achieve a target BP of 140/80 mmHg.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in the proportion of patients achieving target BP at 1 year between the intervention and control groups (36.6% vs. 34.3%, P = 0.27).
- Mean systolic and diastolic BP levels were identical in both groups (143/78 mmHg).
- The intervention group showed a higher rate of BP-related primary care consultations (rate ratio = 1.55, P<0.001) and potentially higher medication doses without a significant increase in drug variety.
Conclusions:
- Implementing a BP treatment algorithm in primary care did not enhance BP control for patients with type 2 diabetes, despite increased monitoring and medication adjustments.
- Findings suggest that treatment improvements observed in specialist nurse-led secondary care settings may not be directly transferable to primary care environments for this population.
Background:
Good blood pressure (BP) control reduces the risk of complications in people with type 2 diabetes, yet many do not achieve this. Guidelines for managing hypertension recommend increasing antihypertensive medications until control is achieved, but the effect of such recommendations in routine primary care is unknown.
Aim:
To evaluate the effectiveness of a BP treatment algorithm in primary care patients with type 2 diabetes.
Design Of Study:
A cluster randomised controlled trial of 1534 patients with type 2 diabetes.
Setting:
Forty-two practices in Nottingham, UK.
Method:
Practices were randomised to continue usual care or to use a treatment algorithm designed so that practice nurses and GPs would increase antihypertensive treatment in steps until the target of 140/80 mmHg was reached. Participants were assessed by a clinical interview and case note review at recruitment and at 1 year. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of participants achieving target BP at 1 year.
Results:
At 1 year there was no difference between the proportions of participants with well controlled BP in the intervention and control arms (36.6% versus 34.3%; P = 0.27). Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures were identical in the two arms (143/78 mmHg). There was some evidence that participants in the intervention arm were more likely to be receiving higher doses of their antihypertensive drugs, although there was no significant difference in the number of different antihypertensive drugs prescribed. Participants in the intervention arm had a higher rate of primary care BP-related consultations over 12 months than those receiving usual care (rate ratio = 1.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.26 to 1.88, P<0.001).
Conclusion:
Despite increased monitoring and possibly higher doses of medication there was no improvement in blood pressure control. Improvements achieved by specialist nurse-led clinics in secondary care may not translate to people with type 2 diabetes in primary care settings.
Related Concept Videos
Diabetes: Management and Pharmacotherapy
Insulin remains the cornerstone of treatment for most patients with type 1 and many...
Hypertension IV: Drug Therapy and Lifestyle Modifications
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies