Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 29, 2026

The Perinatal Asphyxiated Lamb Model: A Model for Newborn Resuscitation
Published on: August 15, 2018
[Impact of cardiopulmonary resuscitation on extremely low birth weight infants]
A Ma Sánchez-Torres1, A García-Alix, F Cabañas
1Servicio de Neonatología, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid Spain. anasancheztorres@hotmail.com
Insights
Extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants receiving Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) in the delivery room did not show poorer survival or increased non-neurological morbidity. However, CPR was linked to a significantly higher risk of overall neurological damage.
Area of Science:
- Neonatalogy
- Pediatric Cardiology
- Perinatal Medicine
Context:
- Extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants represent a vulnerable population requiring intensive care.
- Delivery room interventions, including Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR), are critical for immediate survival.
- The long-term effects of delivery room CPR on neurological and general morbidity in ELBW infants remain a significant concern.
Purpose:
- To investigate the association between delivery room Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) and subsequent survival and morbidity in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants.
- To compare neurological and general morbidity outcomes between ELBW infants who received CPR and those who did not in the delivery room.
Summary:
- A retrospective cohort study of 150 ELBW infants (23-27 weeks gestation) compared those who received delivery room CPR (n=32) with those who did not.
- Survival rates at discharge were similar (62.5% vs. 76.3%). Infants receiving CPR experienced more air leaks and coagulopathy.
- While individual neurological morbidities like intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and periventricular leucomalacia (PVL) were not significantly different, a combined analysis revealed a threefold increased risk of general neurological morbidity in the CPR group (46.7% vs. 21.6%).
Impact:
- Delivery room CPR in ELBW infants is not associated with poorer survival or increased non-neurological neonatal morbidity.
- Despite similar rates of specific neurological injuries, CPR administration is linked to a substantially higher overall risk of neurological damage in this high-risk population.
- Findings highlight the need for careful consideration of delivery room interventions and potential long-term neurological consequences in ELBW infants.
Objective:
To examine whether extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants who undergo Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) in the delivery room present poorer survival and greater short-term neurological and general morbidity than those who do not.
Methods:
In a retrospective cohort of 150 ELBW infants born at our hospital between 2000 and 2004, those who needed CPR and those who did not were compared for mortality and short-term general and neurological morbidity. Infants with major birth defects, suspicion of genetic disease and those without a proactive perinatal attitude in the delivery room were excluded. CPR was defined as the administration of chest compressions and/or epinephrine in the delivery room.
Results:
150 infants were included, with gestational ages of 23-27 weeks (mean 25.6+/-1.2), birth weight of 425-995 grams (mean 745.2+/-132). Delivery room CPR was given to 32 infants (21.4%). No differences in perinatal characteristics were found except for lower pH and Apgar score and a higher SNAPPE score in infants who underwent CPR. Survival at discharge was similar (62.5% vs 76.3% for those without CPR). Infants who received CPR needed more surfactant, oxygen and higher median airway pressure than infants who did not. Air leaks and coagulopathy were more frequent in CPR infants (p<0.01). Prevalence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, necrotizing enterocolitis and retinopathy was similar in the two groups. No statistical differences between ELBW infants who needed CPR and those who did not were found in prevalence of intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) (62.5% vs 52.5%), IVH III (31.2% vs 17.7%), periventricular haemorrhagic infarction (PHI) (18.7% vs 11%) or cystic periventricular leucomalacia (PVL) (15.6% vs 11%). However, in a combined analysis of neurological morbidity (IVH III and/or PVL and/or PHI), significant differences between the two groups were found (46.7% vs 21.6%; p=0.01).
Conclusion:
This study does not support poorer survival or significant non-neurological morbidity during the neonatal period in ELBW infants who receive CPR. Although the prevalence of individual neurological problems was similar in the two groups, CPR was associated with a clear increase in general neurological morbidity, with a three-times greater risk of brain damage.
More Related Videos
10:55A Piglet Perinatal Asphyxia Model to Study Cardiac Injury and Hemodynamics after Cardiac Arrest, Resuscitation, and the Return of Spontaneous Circulation
Published on: January 13, 2023
11:27A Modified Sonographic Algorithm for Image Acquisition in Life-Threatening Emergencies in the Critically Ill Newborn
Published on: April 7, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Pulmonary Cycle: Exhalation
Pneumothorax-I
Pneumothorax can be even further classified as spontaneous, traumatic, and tension pneumothorax.
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management