Related Experiment Videos
[Evaluation criteria for bronchial carcinoma. How to read a meta-analysis?]
1Data Centre, Institut Jules Bordet, Bruxelles, Belgique. marianne.paesmans@bordet.be
Abstract:
A meta-analysis is a research procedure aiming, within the context of evidence based medicine, to combine the results of several studies in a systematic and quantifiable way. The technique is particularly useful where the individual studies give contradictory or inconclusive results. Interest in meta-analyses has increased since the early 1990's and has produced a series of publications aimed at defining the methodology and ensuring reproducible and unbiased results. The purpose of the present paper is to review briefly this methodology, to allow the critical evaluation of a meta-analysis and to discuss its internal and external validity. Meta-analysis is a powerful tool for developing recommendations for clinical practice. However, it does have limitations that must be recognised and cannot give satisfactory answers unless the individual studies are both homogeneous and of sound methodology.
Related Concept Videos
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease III: Chronic Bronchitis Features
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I
Cancer Survival Analysis
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
Endoscopic Studies I: Bronchoscopy and Thoracoscopy
Bronchoscopy
Description
Bronchoscopy is a procedure that involves direct visualization of the larynx, trachea, and bronchi for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. A flexible fiber optic or rigid bronchoscope is used to carry out the procedure. The fiber-optic bronchoscope is more frequently used due to...