Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2026

07:00
Failure of Cleaning Verification in Pharmaceutical Industry Due to Uncleanliness of Stainless Steel Surface
Published on: August 11, 2017
FDA rules for R&D also: root cause analysis and failure investigations
Summary
This session outlines essential regulatory documentation and methodologies for medical device and drug-device combination development. It addresses common pitfalls throughout the research and development lifecycle, including testing and marketing phases.
Area of Science:
- Medical device development
- Pharmaceutical engineering
- Regulatory affairs
Background:
- Navigating the complex regulatory landscape for medical devices and drug-device combinations is critical for successful product development.
- Understanding specific documentation and methodologies is essential for Research and Development (R&D) scientists and engineers.
Purpose of the Study:
- To discuss successful methodologies and regulatory documentation for medical devices and drug-device combinations.
- To identify and address common regulatory pitfalls throughout the product development lifecycle.
- To share group experiences and insights from R&D, animal testing, clinical testing, and marketing phases.
Main Methods:
- A guided roundtable discussion format.
- Exploration of the medical device and drug-device combination development lifecycle.
- Sharing of group experiences and practical insights.
Main Results:
- Identification of key documentation requirements for various regulatory pathways.
- Discussion on laboratory organization under Good Manufacturing Practices (GMPs) for R&D versus Quality Control (QC).
- Insights into FDA audit experiences within R&D laboratories.
Conclusions:
- Successful medical device and drug-device combination development requires meticulous attention to regulatory documentation and methodologies.
- Proactive identification and mitigation of regulatory pitfalls are crucial for efficient development and marketing.
- Sharing practical experiences and understanding GMP differences between R&D and QC are vital for compliance and successful audits.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Regulation
Drug regulation encompasses the management of drug usage by evaluating its safety and efficacy through assessments conducted by regulatory authorities. Regrettably, the history of drug regulation is marred by several catastrophic events. One such incident is the Elixir Sulfanilamide tragedy, in which the toxic compound diethyl glycol was included in a sweet-tasting medication, leading to numerous fatalities. This event prompted the enactment of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act in 1938. Under...
FDA Approved Drugs: Changes to Approved Drugs
Post-approval, manufacturers may modify an approved new or generic drug product. Such modifications can encompass alterations in the Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API), manufacturing process, formulation, batch size, manufacturing site, and container closure system (FDA Guidance for Industry, April 2004). Often, a drug product may undergo multiple changes.These modifications require careful evaluation to determine their potential impact on the drug product's identity, strength, quality,...
Pharmacovigilance
Post-marketing surveillance is a critical component of pharmaceutical regulation, often uncovering unanticipated adverse drug reactions (ADRs) once a drug is widely used over an extended period.
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Investigation of Disease Outbreaks
Multistate foodborne outbreaks pose significant public health risks and require meticulous investigation to identify sources and implement control measures. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) utilizes a dynamic seven-step process for these investigations, integrating data from laboratories, interviews, and environmental assessments to protect public health.Outbreak Detection: The detection of multistate outbreaks typically begins with PulseNet, the CDC's national laboratory...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers
In certain scenarios, in vitro dissolution tests can replace in vivo bioequivalence studies. This is particularly true when a drug product, though available in varying strengths, maintains proportional similarity in its active and inactive ingredients. In such cases, the need for in vivo bioequivalence studies for lower strength variants may be waived, provided dissolution tests and in vivo studies on the highest strength yield satisfactory results.Bioequivalence can be indicated through...
