Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 30, 2026
11:24
High Precision FRET at Single-molecule Level for Biomolecule Structure Determination
Published on: May 13, 2017
Coupling coherence distinguishes structure sensitivity in protein electron transfer
Tatiana R Prytkova1, Igor V Kurnikov, David N Beratan
1Departments of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Science (New York, N.Y.)
|February 3, 2007
Summary
Electron tunneling in cytochrome b562 derivatives shows two distinct coupling limits: a structure-insensitive multiple-pathway regime and a structure-dependent single-pathway limit, unifying electron transfer rate descriptions.
Area of Science:
- Biophysical Chemistry
- Quantum Biology
- Protein Electron Transfer
Background:
- Cytochrome b562 proteins are crucial for biological electron transfer.
- Understanding electron tunneling mechanisms is key to deciphering biological energy transfer.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the protein-mediated electron tunneling mechanisms in cytochrome b562 derivatives.
- To identify distinct coupling regimes governing electron transfer rates.
Main Methods:
- Quantum mechanical analysis of electron tunneling.
- Studying nine thermally fluctuating cytochrome b562 derivatives.
- Analyzing redox partner coupling pathways.
Main Results:
- Identified two distinct protein-mediated coupling limits: structure-insensitive (multiple-pathway) and structure-dependent (single-pathway).
- Seven derivatives exhibited a multiple-pathway regime via heme-edge coupling.
- Two derivatives showed a single-pathway limit through axial-ligand coupling, resulting in slower rates.
Conclusions:
- A unified two-regime paradigm describes electron transfer rates across various proteins.
- This model applies to ruthenium-modified proteins and photosynthetic systems.
- Protein structure and dynamics significantly influence electron tunneling pathways and rates.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
01:08NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling
2.9K
The spin state of an NMR-active nucleus can have a slight effect on its immediate electronic environment. This effect propagates through the intervening bonds and affects the electronic environments of NMR-active nuclei up to three bonds away; occasionally, even farther. This phenomenon is called spin–spin coupling or J-coupling. Coupling interactions are mutual and result in small changes in the absorption frequencies of both nuclei involved. While nuclei of the same element are involved...
2.9K
01:17Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
1.4K
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
1.4K
01:20Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
1.6K
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
1.6K
01:27¹H NMR: Long-Range Coupling
2.6K
The coupling interactions of nuclei across four or more bonds are usually weak, with J values less than 1 Hz. While these are usually not observed in spectra, the presence of multiple bonds along the coupling pathway can result in observable long-range coupling.
In alkenes, spin information is communicated via σ–π overlap, as seen in allylic (four-bond) and homoallylic (five-bond) couplings. These coupling interactions are stronger when the σ bond is parallel to the alkene...
In alkenes, spin information is communicated via σ–π overlap, as seen in allylic (four-bond) and homoallylic (five-bond) couplings. These coupling interactions are stronger when the σ bond is parallel to the alkene...
2.6K
01:04¹³C NMR: ¹H–¹³C Decoupling
1.7K
The probability of having two carbon-13 atoms next to each other is negligible because of the low natural abundance of carbon-13. Consequently, peak splitting due to carbon-carbon spin-spin coupling is not observed in spectra. However, protons up to three sigma bonds away split the carbon signal according to the n+1 rule, resulting in complicated spectra.
A broadband decoupling technique is used to simplify these complex, sometimes overlapping, signals. Broadband decoupling relies on a...
A broadband decoupling technique is used to simplify these complex, sometimes overlapping, signals. Broadband decoupling relies on a...
1.7K
01:12Double Resonance Techniques: Overview
693
Double resonance techniques in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy involve the simultaneous application of two different frequencies or radiofrequency pulses to manipulate and observe two distinct nuclear spins. One important application of double resonance is spin decoupling, which selectively suppresses coupling with one type of nucleus while observing the NMR signal from another nucleus, simplifying the spectrum and enhancing resolution.
Spin decoupling is usually achieved by...
Spin decoupling is usually achieved by...
693