Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2026

Live-Cell Förster Resonance Energy Transfer Imaging of Metabolically Regulated Akt Activation Dynamics in HepG2 Cells
Published on: May 23, 2025
Differential activation of CREB by Akt1 and Akt2
Satomi Kato1, Jixin Ding, Keyong Du
1Molecular Oncology Research Institute, Tufts-New England Medical Center, Boston, MA 02111, USA.
Abstract:
Members of Akt family are highly conserved protein kinase and yet, they show clearly distinct in vivo functions. Here, we have examined the abilities of Akt1 and Akt2 to activate CREB. We found that, in contrast to Akt1 that induces CREB phosphorylation at Ser-133 and CREB target gene expression, Akt2 was unable to induce CREB phosphorylation at Ser-133 in vivo and CREB target gene expression. This difference is specific to CREB as both Akt1 and Akt2 similarly inhibits FoxO1 mediated gene expression. We further showed that the regulatory domain of Akt plays a critical role to confer Akt substrate specificity as substitution of regulatory domain of Akt1 with that of Akt2 abolished the ability of Akt1 to activate CREB. We suggest that the regulatory domain of Akts contributes to the functional difference between Akt1 and Akt2.
Insights
The Akt1 protein kinase activates CREB (cAMP response element-binding protein) phosphorylation and gene expression, while Akt2 does not. This difference in function is linked to the regulatory domain of Akt proteins.
Area of Science:
- Molecular Biology
- Cell Signaling
- Biochemistry
Background:
- The Akt family of protein kinases are crucial for diverse cellular functions.
- Despite high conservation, Akt isoforms (Akt1, Akt2, Akt3) exhibit distinct in vivo roles.
- Understanding isoform-specific functions is key to deciphering complex cellular signaling pathways.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate and compare the abilities of Akt1 and Akt2 to activate CREB (cAMP response element-binding protein).
- To identify the molecular determinants responsible for potential differences in Akt1 and Akt2 substrate specificity.
- To elucidate the role of the regulatory domain in conferring functional specificity to Akt isoforms.
Main Methods:
- In vivo studies examining CREB phosphorylation at Ser-133.
- Analysis of CREB target gene expression.
- Investigation of FoxO1 mediated gene expression.
- Site-directed mutagenesis to substitute regulatory domains between Akt1 and Akt2.
Main Results:
- Akt1, but not Akt2, induced CREB phosphorylation at Ser-133 and subsequent target gene expression in vivo.
- Both Akt1 and Akt2 effectively inhibited FoxO1 mediated gene expression, indicating CREB specificity.
- Substitution of the Akt1 regulatory domain with that of Akt2 abolished Akt1's ability to activate CREB.
- Conversely, substitution of the Akt2 regulatory domain with that of Akt1 conferred CREB activation ability.
Conclusions:
- The regulatory domain of Akt proteins is a critical determinant of substrate specificity, particularly for CREB activation.
- Functional divergence between Akt1 and Akt2 in CREB signaling is mediated by their respective regulatory domains.
- These findings highlight the importance of isoform-specific regulatory mechanisms in Akt-mediated cellular processes.
Related Concept Videos
cAMP-dependent Protein Kinase Pathways
PI3K/mTOR/AKT Signaling Pathway
MAPK Signaling Cascades
Calmodulin-dependent Signaling
The Ca2+-CaM complex does not have enzymatic activity by itself. Instead, the complex binds downstream target proteins, including membrane proteins or enzymes,...
Interactions Between Signaling Pathways
Convergence and divergence, and cross-talk between signaling pathways
Two distinct signaling pathways can converge on a single functional unit, which may either be a single protein or a complex of proteins. The response is either functionally distinct or synergistic between the two pathways but different from the response...
Eukaryotic Transcription Activators
The binding domains are capable of recognizing and interacting with regulatory sequences on the DNA. These domains are...

