Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Useful imaging in maxillofacial surgery. Part II: practical applications].

P Bourjat1

  • 1Institut de radiologie, faculté de médecine, CHU de Strasbourg, 4, rue Kirschleger, 67000 Strasbourg, France. pbourjat@noos.fr

Revue De Stomatologie Et De Chirurgie Maxillo-Faciale
|February 6, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Orbital blow-out fractures].

Journal de radiologie·2006
Same author

[What's useful in maxillo-facial surgery imaging: advantages and disavantages of examination modalities (first part)].

Revue de stomatologie et de chirurgie maxillo-faciale·2006
Same author

[Imaging of facial changes in hyperparathyroidism].

Journal de radiologie·2005
Same author

[Imaging of mandibular malformations and deformities].

Journal de radiologie·2003
Same author

[Ectopic parotid gland in the mandible and masseter muscle].

Revue de stomatologie et de chirurgie maxillo-faciale·2002
Same author

[Sinonasal sarcoidosis: CT evaluation].

Journal de radiologie·2002
Same journal

[Proceedings of the 48th Congress SFSCMF Surgery and pre-implantation and implantology,27–29 September 2012, Versailles, France].

Revue de stomatologie et de chirurgie maxillo-faciale·2013
Same journal

[Contribution and limitations of MIS(®) screwed expanders in the jaws: illustration from clinical cases and comparison of the osseous volume from three-dimensional radiographic pictures].

Revue de stomatologie et de chirurgie maxillo-faciale·2012
Same journal

[Complications of head and neck skin expansion].

Revue de stomatologie et de chirurgie maxillo-faciale·2012
Same journal

[Complex fronto-orbital reconstruction with a PEEK prosthesis and skin expansion: about a case].

Revue de stomatologie et de chirurgie maxillo-faciale·2012
Same journal

[PEEK customized implant for skull esthetic reconstruction].

Revue de stomatologie et de chirurgie maxillo-faciale·2012
Same journal

[Subcutaneous malar nodule].

Revue de stomatologie et de chirurgie maxillo-faciale·2012
See all related articles

Choosing the right radiographic imaging is key for accurate diagnosis. Computed tomography (CT) is best for bone and cavities, while magnetic resonance (MR) excels in soft tissue evaluation.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Diagnostic Imaging

Background:

  • Accurate diagnosis of various pathologic patterns relies on appropriate radiographic imaging.
  • Selecting the optimal imaging modality is crucial for achieving the most accurate diagnostic results.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide guidance on selecting the most suitable radiographic imaging modalities for diverse pathologic conditions.
  • To highlight the strengths of different imaging techniques based on specific anatomic patterns and tissue types.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of various pathologic patterns and their recommended imaging approaches.
  • Comparison of panoramic radiography, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.
  • Emphasis on modality selection based on the need for accuracy and specific anatomical considerations.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Panoramic radiography is presented as a fundamental, cost-effective imaging method.
  • CT is preferred for evaluating bone and cavities.
  • MR is indicated for soft tissue and cavity content assessment, with advancements improving tissue discrimination.

Conclusions:

  • The choice of imaging modality (CT or MR) should be guided by the specific anatomic patterns of the pathology.
  • Advancements in MR technology enhance its capability to differentiate between normal and pathologic tissues.
  • Tailoring imaging selection ensures optimal diagnostic accuracy for a wide range of conditions.