Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2026

Predicting Amputation using Local Circulating Mononuclear Progenitor Cells in Angioplasty-treated Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia
Published on: September 22, 2020
Comparison between stenting and balloon in elderly patients undergoing primary angioplasty for ST-segment elevation
Giuseppe De Luca1, Harry Suryapranata, Jan Paul Ottervanger
1Divison of Cadiology, Ospedale Maggiore della Carità, Università del Piemonte Orientale A. Avogadro, Novara, Italy.
Insights
Routine coronary stenting offers no significant clinical benefit over balloon angioplasty for elderly patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). This finding suggests a need for individualized treatment approaches in this high-risk population.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Geriatric Medicine
Background:
- ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treatment often involves coronary stenting.
- While effective in younger populations, data on stenting benefits in elderly STEMI patients are limited.
- Elderly STEMI patients represent a high-risk subgroup requiring specific treatment evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the clinical benefits of routine coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty in elderly patients (over 75 years) with STEMI.
- To assess the impact of stenting on mortality, reinfarction, and major adverse cardiac events in this demographic.
Main Methods:
- The Zwolle-6 randomized trial included 1683 STEMI patients randomized to stenting or balloon angioplasty.
- A subgroup analysis focused on 143 patients aged 75 years or older.
- One-year follow-up data were collected for all participants.
Main Results:
- In patients over 75, no significant differences were observed in 1-year mortality (17.1% vs 11.9%), reinfarction (9.2% vs 11.9%), target vessel revascularization (15.8% vs 14.9%), or major adverse cardiac events (28.9% vs 26.9%) between stenting and balloon angioplasty groups.
- Statistical analysis showed no significant difference (p=NS) for any of the primary or secondary endpoints.
Conclusions:
- Routine coronary stenting does not appear to offer superior clinical benefits compared to balloon angioplasty in elderly patients with STEMI.
- The established benefits of stenting in acute myocardial infarction may not directly translate to the elderly population.
- Findings suggest that treatment decisions for STEMI in elderly patients should consider individual risk factors and may not universally favor stenting.
Background:
Coronary stenting has been shown to improve clinical outcome in comparison with balloon angioplasty in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, few data have been reported so far in the elderly. Thus, the aim of the current study was to evaluate the benefits from routine stenting in this high-risk subset of patients.
Methods:
In the Zwolle-6 randomized trial a total of 1683 consecutive patients with STEMI was randomized to stenting or balloon angioplasty without any exclusion criteria. One year follow-up data were available from all patients.
Results:
Among a total of 143 patients older than 75 years, 73 were randomized to stent and 67 to balloon angioplasty. No difference was observed in 1-year mortality (17.1% vs 11.9%, p=NS), reinfarction (9.2% vs 11.9%, p=NS), target vessel revascularization (15.8% vs 14.9%, p=NS) or major adverse cardiac events (28.9% vs 26.9%, p=NS) between the groups at 1-year follow-up.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, our study showed that as compared to balloon angioplasty, the clinical benefits of routine coronary stenting in the setting of acute myocardial infarction may not be necessarily applicable to elderly patients.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management