Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Dynamics of target selection in multiple object tracking (MOT).

Zenon W Pylyshyn1, Vidal Annan

  • 1Rutgers University, Center for Cognitive Science, Psychology Building Annex, 152 Frelinghuysen Road, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854-8020, USA. zenon@ruccs.rutgers.edu

Spatial Vision
|February 7, 2007
PubMed
Summary

Visual object selection can be voluntary, requiring more time for complement sets. This voluntary attention aids automatic attention capture, enhancing visual tracking.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A simple proximity heuristic allows tracking of multiple objects through occlusion.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2012
Same author

Enumerating by pointing to locations: a new method for measuring the numerosity of visual object representations.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2011
Same author

Attentional resources in visual tracking through occlusion: the high-beams effect.

Cognition·2008
Same author

Is motion extrapolation employed in multiple object tracking? Tracking as a low-level, non-predictive function.

Cognitive psychology·2006
Same author

Lightness depends on immediately prior experience.

Perception & psychophysics·2005
Same author

Mental imagery: in search of a theory.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2003

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Perception
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Multiple Object Tracking (MOT) paradigms typically involve automatic (exogenous) attentional selection.
  • The capacity for voluntary (endogenous) selection and tracking of multiple visual objects remains an area of investigation.
  • Understanding the interplay between automatic and voluntary attention is crucial for cognitive models of perception.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether multiple visual objects can be voluntarily selected and tracked in a MOT paradigm.
  • To determine if voluntary selection involves a distinct cognitive process compared to automatic selection.
  • To explore the temporal dynamics and underlying mechanisms of voluntary visual object selection.

Main Methods:

  • Four experiments employed a Multiple Object Tracking (MOT) paradigm.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Experiment 1: Object selection based on arbitrary labels.
  • Experiment 2: Selection of complement sets (e.g., non-flashed items) versus automatically selected sets.
  • Experiment 3: Investigated attentional disengagement from automatic selections.
  • Experiment 4: Manipulated the number of targets to assess processing load.
  • Data analysis focused on reaction times and tracking accuracy.

    • Main Results:

    • Visual objects can be voluntarily selected based on labels (Experiment 1).
    • Selecting complement sets requires additional time but is achievable within 1080 ms (Experiment 2).
    • The additional time is not solely due to attentional disengagement (Experiment 3).
    • Increased target numbers yield a greater benefit from added time, suggesting a serial process (Experiment 4).

    Conclusions:

    • Voluntary attention can be allocated to select and track multiple visual objects.
    • Voluntary selection involves distinct temporal characteristics compared to automatic selection.
    • Voluntarily allocated attention can facilitate automatic attention capture, aligning with Visual Index (FINST) theory.