How to make your article more acceptable for the statistical reviewer
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2026

Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research Using Biological Standards: The Example of Platelet Agonist Collagen-Related Peptide
Published on: August 4, 2023
1Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Abstract:
Many medical articles have problems with methodological aspects. To help prevent this, medical statisticians should be more involved in all aspects of medical research. Having more statistical reviewing of manuscripts submitted to journals should also help, but will not cure the problem. This paper makes some suggestions that may help authors make manuscripts more acceptable methodologically, but there is no substitute for statistical involvement throughout the research process. Neurourol. Urodynam. 26:318-322, 2007. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview
Statistical Significance

