Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ultrasonography01:17

Ultrasonography

Ultrasonography is an imaging technique that uses high-frequency sound waves to visualize the body's internal structures. It is a non-invasive and safe procedure that does not involve the use of ionizing radiation, making it widely used in various medical fields. Ultrasonography is used to study heart function, blood flow in the neck or extremities, certain conditions such as gallbladder disease, and fetal growth and development.
During an ultrasonography procedure, a handheld device called a...
Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography01:24

Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography

IntroductionUltrasonography, or renal ultrasound, is a noninvasive medical imaging technique that uses high-frequency sound waves to visualize the kidneys, ureters, bladder, and surrounding tissues.Indications for Urinary System UltrasonographyUrinary system ultrasonography is indicated in various clinical scenarios, such as:Kidney Stones (Urolithiasis): To detect and monitor the size and presence of kidney or urinary tract stones.Hydronephrosis: To assess the dilation of the renal pelvis and...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Hadamard-encoded synthetic beamforming for high frame rate acoustoelectric current source imaging.

Ultrasonics·2026
Same author

First Standard Quantification of Ultrasound Attenuation in Healthy Periodontal Soft Tissues In Vivo.

Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2026
Same author

Quantification of Histotripsy Dosage Using Machine Learning-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging Analysis: Correlation with Histological Outcomes.

Academic radiology·2026
Same author

Transcranial acoustoelectric imaging (tABI) of seizure activity in human head model with neuronavigation.

Journal of neural engineering·2026
Same author

Infection Prevention and Control in the Intensive Care Unit.

Critical care clinics·2026
Same author

Nearest neighbors phase control for optical phased array communications.

Optics express·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 17, 2026

Troubleshooting FoCUS Image Acquisition: Patient Positioning, Transducer Manipulation, and Image Optimization
06:50

Troubleshooting FoCUS Image Acquisition: Patient Positioning, Transducer Manipulation, and Image Optimization

Published on: March 3, 2023

Evaluating thin compression paddles for mammographically compatible ultrasound.

Rebecca C Booi1, Jochen F Krücker, Mitchell M Goodsitt

  • 1Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. rbooi@umich.edu

Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
|February 7, 2007
PubMed
Summary

Researchers evaluated different materials and thicknesses for compression paddles used in a combined mammography and ultrasound system. They found that specific polymer paddles allow for high-quality ultrasound imaging while maintaining necessary breast compression. This approach helps clinicians detect breast lesions more effectively during combined screening procedures.

Keywords:
breast imagingacoustic signal transmissiondiagnostic radiologypolymer materials

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Breast Cancer-related Lymphedema
05:44

Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Breast Cancer-related Lymphedema

Published on: January 12, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 17, 2026

Troubleshooting FoCUS Image Acquisition: Patient Positioning, Transducer Manipulation, and Image Optimization
06:50

Troubleshooting FoCUS Image Acquisition: Patient Positioning, Transducer Manipulation, and Image Optimization

Published on: March 3, 2023

Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Breast Cancer-related Lymphedema
05:44

Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Breast Cancer-related Lymphedema

Published on: January 12, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Diagnostic imaging research within mammographically compatible ultrasound
  • Biomedical engineering and medical physics

Background:

Breast cancer detection often relies on multi-modal imaging to improve diagnostic accuracy. Combining digital mammography with three-dimensional ultrasound offers potential benefits for characterizing suspicious lesions. However, scanning through compression paddles introduces significant technical challenges for acoustic signal transmission. Prior research has shown that standard materials can degrade beam focusing and create unwanted reverberations. No prior work had resolved the optimal material properties for maintaining ultrasound image quality during breast compression. This uncertainty drove the need for a systematic evaluation of various polymer options. Researchers required a clear understanding of how different paddle thicknesses influence acoustic performance. That gap motivated the current investigation into materials like lexan and TPX for clinical integration.

Purpose Of The Study:

The aim of this study was to identify the optimal material and thickness for compression paddles in a combined mammography and ultrasound system. Researchers sought to mitigate the signal degradation and beam focusing issues inherent in through-paddle scanning. This investigation addressed the necessity of maintaining high-quality sonographic images while ensuring effective breast compression. The team evaluated various polymers to determine which could best facilitate accurate lesion characterization. By comparing different materials, the authors intended to establish a standard for clinical integration. This work was motivated by the need to improve diagnostic accuracy in multi-modal breast imaging. The study specifically examined how paddle properties influence acoustic transmission and image resolution. Ultimately, the researchers aimed to provide a technical framework for developing reliable combined imaging platforms.

Main Methods:

The review approach involved characterizing image quality through various polymer materials ranging from 0.25 to 2.5 mm in thickness. Investigators compared spatial resolution, contrast, and signal strength against standard no-paddle imaging benchmarks. Analytical experiments prioritized lexan and TPX due to their superior preliminary performance metrics. The team implemented specific beamforming corrections to compensate for the acoustic interface created by the paddle. Researchers utilized test objects to derive precise values for signal loss and lobe levels. Clinical validation occurred through imaging ten human subjects presenting with cysts. Radiologists performed side-by-side comparisons of through-paddle scans and direct-contact ultrasound images. This methodology ensured a comprehensive assessment of both technical acoustic parameters and practical diagnostic utility.

Main Results:

The TPX 2.5 mm paddle demonstrated the highest performance when system beamforming was adjusted for the material interface. Test objects imaged through this paddle showed a spatial resolution reduction of 15% or less. Signal loss remained at or below 7.5 dB, while contrast loss was limited to 3 dB or less. Range lobe levels were maintained at 35 dB below the signal maximum over a 4 cm range. Human subject trials revealed that contrast-to-noise ratio losses were statistically insignificant across the cohort. Radiologists determined that 75% of cysts were at least as detectable through the paddle as in direct-contact scans. These findings indicate that optimized polymer paddles effectively support high-quality sonographic imaging in combined systems. The results confirm that material choice significantly influences the diagnostic capability of through-paddle ultrasound.

Conclusions:

The authors suggest that TPX 2.5 mm paddles provide the most effective performance for combined imaging systems. Synthesis and implications indicate that beamforming corrections are necessary to mitigate signal degradation caused by the paddle interface. Findings show that spatial resolution remains largely preserved when using optimized materials. The data suggest that signal loss and contrast reduction stay within acceptable clinical limits. Radiologists reported that cyst detection rates in through-paddle scans compare favorably to direct-contact methods. The researchers propose that thinner TPX options remain viable depending on specific diagnostic requirements. Statistical analysis confirmed that observed contrast-to-noise ratio losses in human subjects were not significant. These results support the feasibility of integrating ultrasound scanning directly through mammographic compression devices.

The researchers propose that TPX 2.5 mm paddles achieve optimal results by minimizing signal loss to 7.5 dB or less. In contrast, other materials often cause greater acoustic interference, which complicates lesion identification during combined mammography and ultrasound procedures.

The study evaluated lexan, polyurethane, TPX, and mylar. While lexan and TPX were identified as the most competitive candidates, the authors highlight that TPX 2.5 mm provides superior spatial and contrast resolution compared to the other tested polymers.

Beamforming corrections are necessary to account for the acoustic properties of the paddle. Without these adjustments, the system experiences degraded focusing and increased reverberations, which prevent accurate sonographic assessment of breast tissue.

The authors utilized test objects to quantify spatial resolution, signal strength, and contrast loss. These quantitative metrics provide a baseline for evaluating how different paddle thicknesses affect the clarity of ultrasound images compared to direct-contact scanning.

The researchers measured range lobe levels, finding they remained at least 35 dB below the signal maximum over a 4 cm depth. This measurement indicates the effectiveness of the paddle in maintaining clear imaging without excessive noise.

The authors conclude that 75% of cysts were at least as detectable through the paddle as with direct-contact methods. This finding suggests that the combined system is a viable tool for clinical breast lesion characterization.