Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Stem cell myths.

Tim Magnus1, Ying Liu, Graham C Parker

  • 1Stem Cell Section, Laboratory of Neurosciences, National Institute on Aging, NIH, 333 Cassell Drive, Room 406A, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences
|February 8, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Hyperacute Interleukin-1β Production and Neutrophil Extracellular Trap Formation in the Cerebral Circulation of Stroke Patients with Large Vessel Occlusion.

Annals of neurology·2026
Same author

Timed microglia depletion promotes functional network reorganization and motor recovery after stroke.

Brain communications·2026
Same author

Neuroglial P2Y<sub>1</sub> receptor signalling differentially contributes to inflammatory neurodegeneration.

Journal of neuroinflammation·2026
Same author

Neurotransmitter-Informed Connectome Approach to Language Impairment After Stroke.

Stroke·2026
Same author

Genetically engineered bacterial magnetosomes as optimized tracers for magnetic particle imaging.

Acta biomaterialia·2026
Same author

Single-cell omics and flow cytometry identify distinct immune states of dural and brain-infiltrating IL-17-producing γδ T cells after experimental stroke.

Journal of neuroinflammation·2026

This review debunks nine common myths surrounding stem cell therapy, emphasizing the need for rigorous scientific evaluation. It highlights the importance of reporting both successful and failed experiments for accurate therapeutic assessment.

Area of Science:

  • * Regenerative Medicine
  • * Developmental Biology
  • * Cell Biology

Background:

  • * Stem cells offer significant potential for understanding development and for therapeutic applications.
  • * Uncritical enthusiasm in the field of stem cell research can sometimes overshadow realistic expectations.
  • * Evaluating stem cells for therapeutic use requires careful consideration of various factors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • * To identify and discuss nine prevalent myths that influence the assessment of stem cells for therapeutic purposes.
  • * To advocate for a more rigorous and evidence-based approach to stem cell evaluation.
  • * To guide researchers and clinicians in critically appraising stem cell therapies.

Main Methods:

  • * A comprehensive literature review to identify common misconceptions and myths.

Related Experiment Videos

  • * Critical analysis of existing data and research methodologies in stem cell therapy.
  • * Synthesis of information to formulate recommendations for best practices.

    • Main Results:

    • * Identification of nine key myths that potentially hinder objective evaluation of stem cells.
    • * Emphasis on the need for transparent reporting of both positive and negative experimental outcomes.
    • * Highlighted the importance of a scientifically rigorous approach to validate therapeutic claims.

    Conclusions:

    • * A critical and evidence-based approach is essential for realizing the therapeutic potential of stem cells.
    • * Addressing common myths can lead to more accurate and reliable stem cell evaluations.
    • * Future research should prioritize rigorous data collection and transparent reporting to advance the field.