Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

DNA Isolation

DNA Isolation

DNA isolation protocols can be fast and straightforward or complex and time-consuming depending on the type and quality of DNA required for further processing. For example, plasmid DNA extraction is a bit more complicated than genomic DNA extraction because of the need for an appropriate lysis method to separate plasmid DNA from gDNA during isolation. However, for specific applications, such as long-range DNA sequencing that require a good yield of high- quality DNA samples, we need to follow...

DNA Isolation

DNA Isolation

DNA from cells is required for many biotechnology and research applications, such as molecular cloning. To remove and purify DNA from cells, researchers use various methods of DNA extraction. While the specifics of different protocols may vary, some general concepts underlie the process of DNA extraction.

DNA Agarose Gel Electrophoresis

DNA Agarose Gel Electrophoresis

Agarose gel electrophoresis is a laboratory technique commonly used to separate DNA fragments by size. However, it can also be used to isolate and purify DNA fragments using a gel extraction protocol.
Gel extraction follows five major steps: running gel electrophoresis to separate fragments, isolating the individual bands, extracting DNA from those bands, and removing the dye and salts from the extracted mixture to obtain pure DNA.
In cloning experiments, both the insert and vector DNA...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Deregulation of MicroRNAs mediated control of carnitine cycle in prostate cancer: molecular basis and pathophysiological consequences.

Oncogene·2017

Same author

Human mesenchymal stem cells as novel neuropathic pain tool.

Journal of stem cells & regenerative medicine·2014

Same author

Insulin-like growth factor binding proteins 4 and 7 released by senescent cells promote premature senescence in mesenchymal stem cells.

Cell death & disease·2013

Same author

Synergism between different transport systems stimulates the uptake of neutral amino acids by isolated brain microvessels.

Amino acids·2013

Same author

Gene expression signature of human HepG2 cell line.

Gene·2013

Same author

Efficient cultivation of neural stem cells with controlled delivery of FGF-2.

Stem cell research·2012

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 17, 2026

A Hybrid DNA Extraction Method for the Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Bacterial Communities from Poultry Production Samples

A Hybrid DNA Extraction Method for the Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Bacterial Communities from Poultry Production Samples

Published on: December 10, 2014

Comparative evaluation of different DNA extraction procedures from food samples.

G Di Bernardo¹, S Del Gaudio, U Galderisi

¹Department of Experimental Medicine, Section of Biotechnologies and Molecular Biology, and CRISCEB, 2nd University of Naples, Via Costantinopoli 16, 80138 Naples, Italy.

Biotechnology Progress

|February 9, 2007

Summary

Choosing the right DNA extraction method is crucial for amplifying genetic material from processed soybean and maize food products. This study evaluates five DNA extraction techniques to identify the most effective protocol for reliable detection of genetically modified ingredients.

More Related Videos

Laboratory Protocol for Genetic Gut Content Analyses of Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Using Group-specific rDNA Primers

Laboratory Protocol for Genetic Gut Content Analyses of Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Using Group-specific rDNA Primers

Published on: October 5, 2017

Collection and Extraction of Saliva DNA for Next Generation Sequencing

Collection and Extraction of Saliva DNA for Next Generation Sequencing

Published on: August 27, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 17, 2026

A Hybrid DNA Extraction Method for the Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Bacterial Communities from Poultry Production Samples

A Hybrid DNA Extraction Method for the Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Bacterial Communities from Poultry Production Samples

Published on: December 10, 2014

Laboratory Protocol for Genetic Gut Content Analyses of Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Using Group-specific rDNA Primers

Laboratory Protocol for Genetic Gut Content Analyses of Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Using Group-specific rDNA Primers

Published on: October 5, 2017

Collection and Extraction of Saliva DNA for Next Generation Sequencing

Collection and Extraction of Saliva DNA for Next Generation Sequencing

Published on: August 27, 2014

Area of Science:

Food Science and Technology
Molecular Biology
Biotechnology

Background:

Industrial processing (mechanical, thermal, chemical) significantly impacts DNA integrity in food matrices.
Accurate DNA extraction is essential for downstream applications like genetic modification detection.
Soybean and maize are common food sources with diverse processing histories.

Purpose of the Study:

To compare five DNA extraction methodologies for food samples.
To evaluate the impact of extraction methods on DNA purity, yield, and fragment size.
To determine the optimal DNA extraction protocol for reliable DNA amplification and detection of genetically modified ingredients.

Main Methods:

Analysis of DNA extracted from processed soybean and maize samples using five distinct methods.
Assessment of DNA quality through purity, yield, and average fragment size measurements.
Quantification of DNA degradation using endogenous genes (soybean lectin and alcohol dehydrogenase gene [adh1]).

Main Results:

Significant variations in DNA purity, yield, and integrity were observed among the five extraction methods.
The degree of DNA degradation was influenced by both the food processing methods and the DNA extraction technique employed.
Specific extraction protocols demonstrated superior performance in preserving DNA quality for amplification.

Conclusions:

The choice of DNA extraction method critically influences the success of DNA amplification from processed food.
A comparative evaluation of extraction protocols is vital for selecting the best method for specific food matrices.
Optimized DNA extraction protocols enhance the reliability of detecting genetically modified ingredients in food products.