Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Diagnostic errors and reflective practice in medicine.

Sílvia Mamede¹, Henk G Schmidt, Remy Rikers

¹Innovare Institute, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil. silviamamede@uol.com.br

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

|February 9, 2007

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Cognitive mechanisms underlying anchoring bias in diagnosis: a randomized controlled experiment.

Diagnosis (Berlin, Germany)·2026

Same author

Premature closure underlies bias in medical diagnosis in students: A randomised controlled experiment.

Medical education·2026

Same author

Comparing faded examples and cued reflection in teaching diagnostic reasoning.

Medical teacher·2026

Same author

From Text to Test: Pre-Lecture Reading Boosts Medical Students' Comprehension and Retention.

Saudi medical journal·2026

Same author

Impact of mistreatment on the learning of novice medical students: An experimental study.

Medical education·2025

Same author

Teacher engagement in health profession education: a scoping review.

BMC medical education·2025

Same journal

Evaluating Restraint and Seclusion as Care Processes Rather Than Compliance Metrics.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026

Same journal

Burden in Informal Caregivers of Palliative Care Patients With Pressure Injuries: Perceived Social Support and Influencing Factors Care Burden in Palliative Caregivers.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026

Same journal

Organisational Problems, Role Stress, and Job Satisfaction Among Emergency Department Workers: A Multicenter Mixed-Effects Study.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026

Same journal

Highlighting a Systemic Bias in the Responder Odds Ratio.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026

Same journal

Epistemological Issues in Clinical Reasoning: A Scoping Review.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026

Same journal

An Evaluation of AI-Generated Clinical Notes in the OpenNotes Era: A Thematic Analysis of Clinician Discourse.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026

See all related articles

Reflective practice, or critically thinking about one's own medical work, may help reduce diagnostic errors. Further research is needed to understand how this skill improves clinical reasoning and medical expertise.

Area of Science:

Medical Education
Clinical Reasoning
Patient Safety

Background:

Medical errors, particularly diagnostic errors, pose significant risks to patient safety.
Understanding the origins of medical errors is crucial for developing effective prevention strategies.
Medical expertise is linked to the ability to critically reflect on clinical practice.

Purpose of the Study:

To explore the relationship between reflective practice and diagnostic errors in medicine.
To identify how reflective practice behaviors can potentially minimize diagnostic errors.

Main Methods:

A literature review of medical expertise and diagnostic errors was conducted.
The study theoretically explored the connection between dimensions of reflective practice and diagnostic error origins.

Related Experiment Videos

Analysis focused on common sources of medical errors reported in existing research.

Main Results:

Clinical judgment is inherently uncertain and fallible, creating opportunities for diagnostic errors.
Diagnostic reasoning stages, heuristics, and biases are identified as potential sources of error.
Reflective practice behaviors and reasoning processes may offer a means to mitigate these errors.

Conclusions:

Reflective practice holds potential for reducing diagnostic errors by addressing inherent uncertainties and biases in clinical judgment.
Further empirical research is recommended to validate the impact of reflective practice on clinical reasoning.
Developing educational strategies to enhance reflective practice is a key future direction for improving medical expertise and patient safety.