Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Practical issues in the design and implementation of pay-for-quality programs.

Gary J Young1, Douglas A Conrad

  • 1Department of Health Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Massachusetts, USA.

Journal of Healthcare Management / American College of Healthcare Executives
|February 10, 2007
PubMed
Summary

Pay-for-performance programs aim to improve healthcare quality and control costs. This study examines key considerations for developing effective pay-for-quality initiatives for providers and payers.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Robust policy evaluation from large-scale observational studies.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Hospital-Physician Integration and Differences in the Use of Orthopedic Care Across Race and Ethnicity.

Medical care·2026
Same author

Hospital System Acquisition of Physician Practices.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

Why are Massachusetts opioid prescribing rates higher in rural versus urban areas?

PloS one·2026
Same author

Nephrologist Affiliation With Dialysis Facilities and Patient Trajectories in End-Stage Kidney Disease.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

Financial Assistance Policy, Hospital Charity Care, and Medical Debt in Collections.

JAMA network open·2026
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Management
  • Health Economics
  • Quality Improvement

Background:

  • Healthcare payers and purchasers are implementing pay-for-performance (P4P) programs to enhance care quality and manage escalating costs.
  • These initiatives often involve quality scorecards and financial incentives for healthcare providers, including hospitals and physician groups.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To offer a conceptual framework for understanding the objectives and challenges faced by payers and providers in next-generation pay-for-quality (P4Q) programs.
  • To identify practical issues critical for the development and implementation of P4Q programs across diverse market settings.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of payer and provider perspectives.
  • Identification of practical issues in P4Q program design, including metric selection, accountability units, incentive structure, data systems, and payout formulas.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of real-world P4Q demonstrations (e.g., Rewarding Results, Bridges to Excellence) and provider interviews.

    • Main Results:

    • Key strategies for selecting quality metrics, defining accountability, determining incentive size, and establishing data/measurement systems are crucial.
    • Effective payout formulas and payer collaboration are essential for successful P4Q program implementation.
    • Real-world examples illustrate diverse approaches to P4Q program design and execution.

    Conclusions:

    • Developing and implementing successful P4Q programs requires careful consideration of practical design elements and market dynamics.
    • The findings provide valuable insights for hospitals and physician organizations considering P4Q participation or revising compensation models.