Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2026

Atomic Scale Structural Studies of Macromolecular Assemblies by Solid-state Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Published on: September 17, 2017
A versatile component-coupling model to account for substituent effects: application to polypeptide phi and chi(1)
1Biosciences Department, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NJ, UK. j.m.schmidt@kent.ac.uk
Abstract:
A model is proposed for collating fundamental and incremental component couplings to account for substituent effects on (3)J arising from, for example, amino-acid type variation. The unique topology patterns encountered in each of the common amino acids were modeled by assigning substituents on a (3)J coupling path to four simple categories comprising only relative positions: central (inner) vs. terminal (outer) and first-sphere vs. second-sphere. Associated increment values then reflect the influences on each (3)J coupling accessible for torsion-angle determination. Facility of use of this model, in comparison with previous ones, owes to its strict limitation to no more than three Karplus coefficients for each specific torsion-angle dependency derived. The model was integrated in the concept of self-consistent (3)J analysis and applied to polypeptide fragments X-N-C(alpha)-Y and X-C(alpha)-C(beta)-Y related to torsions phi and chi(1), respectively, yielding quantitative effects of both first- and second-sphere substituents. Regarding the polypeptide backbone, the model predicts first-sphere substituent effects on phi-related (3)J couplings to be within experimental uncertainty because main-chain topologies are identical in most amino-acid types, except for marginal effects in glycine and proline. However, effects in excess of standard errors in (3)J(phi) measurements are anticipated from second-sphere substituent variation. Regarding amino-acid side chains, first-sphere substituent effects on chi(1)-related (3)J couplings were previously found pivotal to accurate torsion-angle interpretation. Taking additional second-sphere effects on (3)J(chi(1)) into account is here demonstrated further to improve biomolecular structure analysis.
More Related Videos
11:27X-Ray Crystallography to Study the Oligomeric State Transition of the Thermotoga maritima M42 Aminopeptidase TmPep1050
Published on: May 13, 2020
09:15Combining X-Ray Crystallography with Small Angle X-Ray Scattering to Model Unstructured Regions of Nsa1 from S. Cerevisiae
Published on: January 10, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
¹H NMR: Long-Range Coupling
In alkenes, spin information is communicated via σ–π overlap, as seen in allylic (four-bond) and homoallylic (five-bond) couplings. These coupling interactions are stronger when the σ bond is parallel to the alkene π orbitals.
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
¹H NMR: Complex Splitting
Splitting diagrams or splitting tree diagrams are routinely used to depict such complex couplings. While drawing splitting diagrams, the splitting with the larger coupling constant is usually applied first.
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must have a...