Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2026
06:48
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
Published on: January 19, 2019
Cooperation, competition and goal interdependence in work teams: a multilevel approach
Aitor Aritzeta1, Nekane Balluerka
1Faculty of Psychology, Universidad del País Vasco, 20018 San Sebastián, Spain. aitor.aritzeta@ehu.es
Psicothema
|February 14, 2007
Summary
Cultural patterns influence team conflict styles. Collectivism fosters cooperation, while individualism promotes competition, especially after a year with goal interdependence. This impacts team building strategies.
Area of Science:
- Organizational Psychology
- Cross-Cultural Psychology
- Team Dynamics
Background:
- Understanding conflict management styles is crucial for team effectiveness.
- Cultural patterns, such as individualism-collectivism and vertical-horizontal dimensions, can shape workplace behaviors.
- The influence of these cultural patterns on conflict styles in new work teams requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To predict cooperative and competitive conflict management styles in new start-up work teams.
- To examine the predictive roles of vertical-horizontal and individualism-collectivism cultural patterns.
- To investigate the moderating effect of goal interdependence on the relationship between cultural patterns and conflict management styles.
Main Methods:
- Multilevel Analysis was employed due to the hierarchically nested data structure of 26 start-up work teams.
- Data were collected at two time points: initially (time 1) and after one year of functioning (time 2).
- Vertical-horizontal and individualism-collectivism cultural patterns were used as predictor variables.
Main Results:
- Horizontal and vertical collectivism were associated with increased cooperation.
- Horizontal and vertical individualism were associated with increased competition.
- Goal interdependence moderated the relationship between cultural patterns and conflict management styles, particularly after one year, influencing cooperation and interaction effects.
Conclusions:
- Cultural dimensions significantly predict conflict management styles in work teams.
- Goal interdependence plays a critical role in moderating these relationships over time.
- Findings offer implications for designing effective team-building and organizational transformational strategies.
Related Concept Videos
01:37Social Loafing
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated, individuals become less...
04:49Robbers Cave
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension could be...
01:27Levels of Communication II: Organizational, Public, and Group Dynamics
Effective communication is the foundation of a good organization. Communication is the lifeblood of an organization that connects the group with messages. In an organization, communication occurs in upward, downward, and horizontal lines. Downward communication travels from the administrative and senior levels to the staff through official channels such as manuals, rules and regulations, and organizational charts. Staff members initiate upward communication, which is addressed to executives and...
01:19Impact of Groups on Groups
Social psychologists analyze how groups influence one another, shaping social structures and interactions through both cooperation and competition. These dynamics manifest in various ways, ranging from economic partnerships to intergroup conflicts that shape societal structures and perceptions.Cooperation and Competition in Intergroup RelationsIntergroup relationships vary across contexts, sometimes fostering cooperation and mutual benefit while at other times leading to conflict and...
01:26Microbial Interactions: Cooperation
Microbial cooperation involves beneficial interactions in which different species work together for individual or mutual advantage. These interactions can profoundly influence ecological dynamics and evolutionary processes, and they are essential to many pathogenic and symbiotic relationships.Nematode–Bacteria CooperationA striking example is the relationship between the Gram-negative bacterium Xenorhabdus nematophila and the parasitic nematode Steinernema carpocapsae. Juvenile nematodes...
01:21Secondary Motives: Affiliation Motivation and Aggression Motivation
Affiliation motivation is the intrinsic desire to connect with others and belong to a social group, which plays a crucial role in forming and maintaining personal relationships. This type of motivation is essential for psychological well-being, as it provides individuals with a sense of community and support. An example of this is a student who joins a study group in order to feel a sense of connection. People with high affiliation motivation actively seek social approval, take satisfaction in...