Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
Significance Testing: Overview01:04

Significance Testing: Overview

Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
Errors and Mistakes in Surveying01:19

Errors and Mistakes in Surveying

Errors and mistakes in surveying refer to inaccuracies in measurements and data recording. The errors are deviations from the actual value caused by human sensory limitations, equipment flaws, or environmental effects. These errors are typically unintentional and can result from the inherent imperfections in the instruments used, atmospheric conditions, or the observer’s inability to perceive exact measurements. On the other hand, mistakes are caused by the surveyor's lack of attention,...
Statistical Significance01:37

Statistical Significance

Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Quality service in supermarkets: a proposal of measurement].

Psicothema·2007
Same author

Factorial structure of recklessness: to what extent are older drivers different?

Journal of safety research·2004
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 17, 2026

An Introduction to Processing, Fitting, and Interpreting Transient Absorption Data
08:12

An Introduction to Processing, Fitting, and Interpreting Transient Absorption Data

Published on: February 16, 2024

[Interpretation mistakes in statistical methods: their importance and some recommendations].

Héctor Monterde i Bort1, Juan Pascual Llobel, María Dolores Frías Navarro

  • 1Faculty of Psychology, Universidad de Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain. hector.monterde@uv.es

Psicothema
|February 14, 2007
PubMed
Summary

Researchers often misinterpret statistical significance tests. This study surveyed Spanish academics to understand these misconceptions and recommend improvements for data analysis and scientific publishing.

More Related Videos

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

Practical Considerations for the Design, Execution, and Interpretation of Studies Involving Whole-Bone Bending Tests of Rodent Bones
04:20

Practical Considerations for the Design, Execution, and Interpretation of Studies Involving Whole-Bone Bending Tests of Rodent Bones

Published on: September 1, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 17, 2026

An Introduction to Processing, Fitting, and Interpreting Transient Absorption Data
08:12

An Introduction to Processing, Fitting, and Interpreting Transient Absorption Data

Published on: February 16, 2024

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

Practical Considerations for the Design, Execution, and Interpretation of Studies Involving Whole-Bone Bending Tests of Rodent Bones
04:20

Practical Considerations for the Design, Execution, and Interpretation of Studies Involving Whole-Bone Bending Tests of Rodent Bones

Published on: September 1, 2023

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Research Methodology
  • Scientific Communication

Context:

  • Misinterpretations of statistical significance tests are prevalent among researchers.
  • Understanding these misconceptions is crucial for accurate scientific interpretation.
  • Prior research has highlighted common errors in statistical analysis.

Purpose:

  • To assess the extent of statistical interpretation misconceptions among Spanish university professors and researchers.
  • To identify specific areas where statistical understanding needs improvement.
  • To gather data for developing targeted educational and editorial recommendations.

Summary:

  • A questionnaire-based study was conducted with university professors and researchers in Spain.
  • The study identified common errors in interpreting statistical significance test results.
  • Results highlight a significant need for enhanced statistical literacy in research.

Impact:

  • Provides insights to prevent incorrect data interpretation in scientific studies.
  • Offers recommendations to correct the misuse of statistical testing in research.
  • Suggests modifications to editorial criteria for publishing scientific work to improve statistical rigor.
  • Aims to foster more accurate data examination and reporting practices.