Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2026

Paramyxoviruses for Tumor-targeted Immunomodulation: Design and Evaluation Ex Vivo
Published on: January 7, 2019
History of oncolytic viruses: genesis to genetic engineering
Elizabeth Kelly1, Stephen J Russell
1Molecular Medicine Program, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
Abstract:
Since the turn of the nineteenth century, when their existence was first recognized, viruses have attracted considerable interest as possible agents of tumor destruction. Early case reports emphasized regression of cancers during naturally acquired virus infections, providing the basis for clinical trials where body fluids containing human or animal viruses were used to transmit infections to cancer patients. Most often the viruses were arrested by the host immune system and failed to impact tumor growth, but sometimes, in immunosuppressed patients, infection persisted and tumors regressed, although morbidity as a result of the infection of normal tissues was unacceptable. With the advent of rodent models and new methods for virus propagation, there were numerous attempts through the 1950s and 1960s to force the evolution of viruses with greater tumor specificity, but success was limited and many researchers abandoned the field. Technology employing reverse genetics later brought about a renewal of interest in virotherapy that allowed the generation of more potent, tumor-specific oncolytics. Here, examination of early oncolytic virotherapy before genetic engineering serves to highlight tremendous advances, yet also hints at ways to penetrate host immune defenses, a significant remaining challenge in modern virotherapy research.
Insights
Early research explored viruses for tumor destruction, facing challenges with immune responses. Modern advances in virotherapy, particularly with genetic engineering, offer potent oncolytics but overcoming host immunity remains a key challenge.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Virology
- Biotechnology
Background:
- Viruses have been investigated as potential cancer therapeutics since the early 19th century.
- Initial clinical trials utilized naturally occurring viral infections to treat cancer patients, with limited success.
Observation:
- Naturally acquired viral infections sometimes led to tumor regression, particularly in immunosuppressed patients.
- Early attempts to engineer tumor-specific viruses (1950s-1960s) yielded limited success, causing many researchers to leave the field.
Findings:
- Advances in reverse genetics have enabled the development of more potent and tumor-specific oncolytic viruses.
- Historical analysis reveals progress in virotherapy while highlighting persistent challenges in evading host immune defenses.
Implications:
- Understanding historical virotherapy limitations informs current strategies for enhancing oncolytic virus efficacy.
- Future research must focus on overcoming host immune responses to achieve successful oncolytic virotherapy.
Related Concept Videos
Rous Sarcoma Virus (RSV) and Cancer
RSV is a retrovirus that contains two copies of a plus-strand RNA genome. Its genome consists of four main open...
Mechanisms of Retrovirus-induced Cancers
Mechanisms of Retrovirus-induced Cancers
Microorganisms in Medicine and Therapeutics
Retroviruses
Viral Mutations
