Related Experiment Videos
Imprecise methods may both obscure and aggravate a relation between fat and breast cancer
1Research Unit for Dietary Studies, Institute of Preventive Medicine, Copenhagen, Denmark. BLH@ipm.hosp.dk
Abstract:
Bias in diet reporting may be both random and non-random, and may be found with simpler as well as more advanced dietary instruments. A random bias will contribute to obscure relations between diet and disease. A systematic bias may obscure or aggravate such associations. Underreporting of non-protein energy has been found to be substantial, particularly among those who are obese or have high dietary intakes. Such a non-random bias on the group level would tend to aggravate associations between dietary non-protein and disease. Whether the net result of the random and non-random bias aggravates or obscures relations depends on the relative magnitude of the two.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Cancer Survival Analysis
Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters assessment...
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision