Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Pulmonary Function Tests01:25

Pulmonary Function Tests

Pulmonary Function Tests (PFTs)
Pulmonary Function Tests are crucial diagnostic tools for assessing respiratory function, particularly in patients with chronic respiratory disorders. They comprehensively evaluate lung volumes, ventilatory function, breathing mechanics, diffusion, and gas exchange. These tests help diagnose pulmonary diseases and play a significant role in monitoring disease progression, evaluating disability, and assessing response to therapy.
PFTs involve using a spirometer, a...
Respiratory Volumes01:15

Respiratory Volumes

Respiratory volumes are crucial metrics, meticulously measured to quantify the air exchanged in and out of the lungs during various phases of the breathing cycle. These precise measurements are vital for assessing lung function, diagnosing respiratory conditions, and monitoring overall respiratory health. Each parameter provides specific insights into the mechanics of breathing and the functional capacity of the lungs.
Tidal Volume (TV) Tidal volume (TV) is the air inhaled or exhaled in a...
Lung Capacity01:47

Lung Capacity

The air in the lungs is measured in volumes and capacities. Lung volume measures reflect the amount of air taken in, released, or left over after a lung function, like a single inhalation. Lung capacity measures are sums of two or more lung volume measures.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reappraising the role of angiography in managing intraluminal postpancreatoduodenectomy hemorrhage: Analysis of 115 cases from 3,011 consecutive pancreatoduodenectomies.

Surgery·2026
Same author

Multicolor Emission in Perovskite Nanostructures via Quantum Confinement Engineering for High-Speed Optical Wireless Communication.

ACS nano·2026
Same author

Thermally Activated Delayed Fluorescence Hybrid Copper(I) Iodide Scintillator for Fast Neutron and X-ray Imaging.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2026
Same author

Polar solvent strategy enables scalable synthesis of perovskite nanocrystal scintillators for fast X-ray imaging.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Mobilization of cadmium and lead mediated by iron and manganese reduction in coastal wetlands of Yueqing Bay, China.

Marine pollution bulletin·2026
Same author

Enhancing X-ray Sensitivity via the Antenna Effect in Quantum Shells with Multiexciton Emission.

ACS nano·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 17, 2026

Dual Test Gas Pulmonary Diffusing Capacity Measurement During Exercise in Humans Using the Single-Breath Method
08:44

Dual Test Gas Pulmonary Diffusing Capacity Measurement During Exercise in Humans Using the Single-Breath Method

Published on: February 2, 2024

[Comparison of lung function measurement values with two different apparatus].

Feng-ying Hao1, Bing-xiang Yu, Li-xin Xie

  • 1Department of Respiratory Medicine, PLA General Hospital, Beijing.

Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi = Chinese Journal of Medical Instrumentation
|February 16, 2007
PubMed
Summary

This study compared lung function measurements from two devices in 41 patients. Results show good correlation between devices, indicating comparable performance for most lung function tests.

More Related Videos

Combining Volumetric Capnography And Barometric Plethysmography To Measure The Lung Structure-function Relationship
08:25

Combining Volumetric Capnography And Barometric Plethysmography To Measure The Lung Structure-function Relationship

Published on: January 8, 2019

Conducting Respiratory Oscillometry in an Outpatient Setting
14:49

Conducting Respiratory Oscillometry in an Outpatient Setting

Published on: April 8, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 17, 2026

Dual Test Gas Pulmonary Diffusing Capacity Measurement During Exercise in Humans Using the Single-Breath Method
08:44

Dual Test Gas Pulmonary Diffusing Capacity Measurement During Exercise in Humans Using the Single-Breath Method

Published on: February 2, 2024

Combining Volumetric Capnography And Barometric Plethysmography To Measure The Lung Structure-function Relationship
08:25

Combining Volumetric Capnography And Barometric Plethysmography To Measure The Lung Structure-function Relationship

Published on: January 8, 2019

Conducting Respiratory Oscillometry in an Outpatient Setting
14:49

Conducting Respiratory Oscillometry in an Outpatient Setting

Published on: April 8, 2022

Area of Science:

  • Pulmonary Function Testing
  • Medical Device Comparison
  • Respiratory Diagnostics

Background:

  • Accurate lung function measurement is crucial for diagnosing and managing respiratory diseases.
  • Different spirometry devices utilize varying measurement principles, potentially leading to discrepancies.
  • Standardization and validation of device performance are essential for clinical reliability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the agreement and correlation between lung function measurements obtained from two different apparatus.
  • To determine if statistically significant differences exist between the devices across various pulmonary function parameters.
  • To assess the clinical applicability of using different devices interchangeably for lung function analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Random measurement analysis of lung function parameters in 41 patients.
  • Comparison of measurement values between two distinct spirometry apparatus.
  • Statistical analysis including significance testing (P-values) and correlation coefficients (r-values).

Main Results:

  • Most lung function measurements showed no statistically significant differences (P>0.05) between the two apparatus.
  • Exceptions included DLCO, FEF25, FEF75 in normal ventilation, and FVC in abnormal ventilation.
  • High correlation (r>0.9) was observed, with minor exceptions like MMF, RV in normal, and FEF75 in abnormal ventilation groups (p<0.001).

Conclusions:

  • The two apparatus, despite different measuring theories, demonstrate good overall correlation for lung function testing.
  • The findings suggest that these devices can be used reliably for most pulmonary function assessments.
  • Further investigation may be warranted for specific parameters with noted discrepancies, particularly in abnormal ventilation groups.