Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Intranasal Administration of Recombinant Influenza Vaccines in Chimeric Mouse Models to Study Mucosal Immunity
Published on: June 25, 2015
Live attenuated versus inactivated influenza vaccine in infants and young children
Robert B Belshe1, Kathryn M Edwards, Timo Vesikari
1Saint Louis University Health Sciences Center, St. Louis, USA. belsherb@slu.edu
Insights
Live attenuated influenza vaccine demonstrated superior efficacy compared to inactivated vaccine in children 6-59 months. While generally safe, live attenuated vaccine showed increased wheezing and hospitalization in infants 6-11 months.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Infectious Diseases
- Vaccinology
- Immunology
Background:
- Universal influenza vaccination is recommended for children aged 6-59 months.
- Inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) is the current standard for this age group.
- Alternative vaccine strategies are being explored to improve efficacy and safety.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the safety and efficacy of intranasally administered live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) versus IIV in infants and young children.
- To evaluate LAIV as a potential alternative to IIV for pediatric influenza immunization.
Main Methods:
- A double-blind, randomized controlled trial involving 8352 children aged 6-59 months.
- Participants received either cold-adapted trivalent LAIV or trivalent IIV.
- Influenza-like illness was monitored, with viral cultures performed throughout the 2004-2005 season.
Main Results:
- LAIV showed significantly higher efficacy, with 54.9% fewer culture-confirmed influenza cases than IIV (153 vs. 338, P<0.001).
- Superior efficacy of LAIV was observed for both matched and drifted influenza viruses.
- In previously unvaccinated children aged 6-11 months, LAIV was associated with more wheezing (3.8% vs. 2.1%, P=0.076) and higher hospitalization rates (6.1% vs. 2.6%, P=0.002).
Conclusions:
- Live attenuated influenza vaccine is significantly more efficacious than inactivated vaccine in young children.
- LAIV is a highly effective and safe vaccine option for children aged 12-59 months without a history of asthma or wheezing.
- Careful consideration of risk-benefit is warranted for infants 6-11 months due to increased rates of wheezing and hospitalization.
Background:
Universal vaccination of children 6 to 59 months of age with trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine has recently been recommended by U.S. advisory bodies. To evaluate alternative vaccine approaches, we compared the safety and efficacy of intranasally administered live attenuated influenza vaccine with those of inactivated vaccine in infants and young children.
Methods:
Children 6 to 59 months of age, without a recent episode of wheezing illness or severe asthma, were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either cold-adapted trivalent live attenuated influenza vaccine (a refrigeration-stable formulation of live attenuated intranasally administered influenza vaccine) or trivalent inactivated vaccine in a double-blind manner. Influenza-like illness was monitored with cultures throughout the 2004-2005 influenza season.
Results:
Safety data were available for 8352 children, and 7852 children completed the study according to the protocol. There were 54.9% fewer cases of cultured-confirmed influenza in the group that received live attenuated vaccine than in the group that received inactivated vaccine (153 vs. 338 cases, P<0.001). The superior efficacy of live attenuated vaccine, as compared with inactivated vaccine, was observed for both antigenically well-matched and drifted viruses. Among previously unvaccinated children, wheezing within 42 days after the administration of dose 1 was more common with live attenuated vaccine than with inactivated vaccine, primarily among children 6 to 11 months of age; in this age group, 12 more episodes of wheezing were noted within 42 days after receipt of dose 1 among recipients of live attenuated vaccine (3.8%) than among recipients of inactivated vaccine (2.1%, P=0.076). Rates of hospitalization for any cause during the 180 days after vaccination were higher among the recipients of live attenuated vaccine who were 6 to 11 months of age (6.1%) than among the recipients of inactivated vaccine in this age group (2.6%, P=0.002).
Conclusions:
Among young children, live attenuated vaccine had significantly better efficacy than inactivated vaccine. An evaluation of the risks and benefits indicates that live attenuated vaccine should be a highly effective, safe vaccine for children 12 to 59 months of age who do not have a history of asthma or wheezing. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00128167 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).
Related Concept Videos
Vaccinations
Active versus Passive Immunity
Active Immunity
Active immunity refers to the resistance one develops...
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Poliomyelitis
Influenza
Respiratory Syncytial Virus Disease

