Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Harm reduction and individually focused alcohol prevention.

Clayton Neighbors1, Mary E Larimer, Ty W Lostutter

  • 1University of Washington, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Seattle, WA 98195-6560, USA. claytonn@u.washington.edu

The International Journal on Drug Policy
|February 16, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Moderation Effect of Basic Need Satisfaction in the Relationship Between Drinking Motives and Drinking Outcomes.

Substance use & misuse·2026
Same author

Drinking to belong: how loneliness fuels alcohol-related consequences.

The Journal of social psychology·2026
Same author

A randomized controlled trial of injunctive norms feedback with and without motivational interviewing to reduce alcohol use and negative consequences among college students.

Journal of consulting and clinical psychology·2026
Same author

Expanding perspectives on reducing harms from drinking in college: A qualitative study.

Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors·2026
Same author

Mechanisms of change for two brief alcohol interventions: Testing theoretical mediators for counter attitudinal advocacy and personalized feedback intervention effects.

Alcohol, clinical & experimental research·2025
Same author

Protocol of a randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of an adapted future possible selves task on drinking identity and hazardous drinking in graduating high school students.

BMC public health·2025

Harm reduction strategies for alcohol prevention are effective, particularly in selective and indicated contexts. Despite evidence, the US largely favors zero-tolerance approaches over harm reduction, unlike other developed nations.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Addiction Medicine
  • Behavioral Science

Background:

  • Harm reduction strategies for alcohol prevention are gaining international acceptance.
  • The United States (US) predominantly employs zero-tolerance approaches for alcohol prevention, especially in adolescents.
  • International comparisons reveal a greater adoption of harm reduction in Europe, Canada, and Australia.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide an overview of harm reduction and individually focused alcohol prevention strategies.
  • To review alcohol prevention efforts in the US, contrasting them with international practices.
  • To highlight the potential of harm reduction in various prevention contexts.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of harm reduction and individually focused alcohol prevention strategies.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of prevention approaches in diverse settings (schools, colleges, medical).
  • Comparison of US prevention policies with those in Europe, Canada, and Australia.

    • Main Results:

    • Harm reduction approaches show considerable promise in universal prevention.
    • Harm reduction is established as best practice in selective and indicated prevention.
    • Zero-tolerance remains the standard for individually focused prevention in the US, despite evidence for harm reduction.

    Conclusions:

    • Harm reduction strategies offer effective alternatives to zero-tolerance in alcohol prevention.
    • The US could benefit from adopting more harm reduction strategies in alcohol prevention.
    • Evidence supports the broader implementation of harm reduction across universal, selective, and indicated prevention levels.