Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Instrument Calibration

Instrument Calibration

Instrument calibration is essential for ensuring that instruments produce accurate and consistent results. It is vital in manufacturing, healthcare, testing laboratories, and scientific research. Calibration processes are specific to each instrument and help enhance data accuracy. Each instrument has a unique calibration process tailored to its design and function to improve data accuracy.
Analytical Balance Calibration
An analytical balance measures mass and requires regular calibration to...

Uncertainty: Overview

Uncertainty: Overview

In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments

Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.

Data Validation

Data Validation

Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:

Decision Making: P-value Method

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

No health without workforce: reinforcing public health capacity amidst global shifts.

BMJ global health·2026

Same author

Geopolitical influences, public health values, and ethics.

Journal of public health (Oxford, England)·2025

Same author

Professionalizing public health education in the Eastern Mediterranean Region.

Frontiers in public health·2025

Same author

Misfolded α-synuclein co-occurrence with Alzheimer's disease proteinopathy.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2025

Same author

Climate and health education in public health schools worldwide during 2023-24: a survey.

The Lancet. Planetary health·2024

Same author

Misfolded alpha synuclein co-occurrence with Alzheimer's disease proteinopathy.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2024

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Absolute Quantification of Aβ1-42 in CSF Using a Mass Spectrometric Reference Measurement Procedure

Absolute Quantification of Aβ_1-42 in CSF Using a Mass Spectrometric Reference Measurement Procedure

Published on: March 21, 2017

Evaluation of assigned-value uncertainty for complex calibrator value assignment processes: a prealbumin example.

John Middleton¹, Jeffrey E Vaks

¹Department of Clinical Chemistry Development, Beckman Coulter Inc., Fullerton, CA 92821, USA. jsmiddleton@beckman.com

Clinical Chemistry

|February 17, 2007

Summary

Estimating calibrator uncertainty using Monte Carlo simulation minimizes errors in patient sample testing. This novel method optimizes complex value assignment processes, reducing measurements and costs while ensuring accuracy.

More Related Videos

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Absolute Quantification of Aβ1-42 in CSF Using a Mass Spectrometric Reference Measurement Procedure

Absolute Quantification of Aβ_1-42 in CSF Using a Mass Spectrometric Reference Measurement Procedure

Published on: March 21, 2017

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

Area of Science:

Clinical Chemistry
Measurement Science
Biomarker Analysis

Background:

Errors in calibrator-assigned values directly impact patient sample testing accuracy.
Accurate estimation of calibrator uncertainty is crucial for minimizing diagnostic errors.
Existing International Organization of Standardization guidelines are insufficient for complex value-assignment processes.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop and apply a Monte Carlo simulation method for estimating calibrator uncertainty in complex value-assignment processes.
To assess the uncertainty associated with a multilevel calibrator for prealbumin immunoassay.
To optimize value-assignment processes for improved efficiency and cost-effectiveness.

Main Methods:

Utilized Monte Carlo computer simulation based on a formalized description of a complex value-assignment process.
Estimated measurement parameters experimentally.
Applied the simulation to a multilevel calibrator value assignment for a prealbumin immunoassay.

Main Results:

The uncertainty introduced during value transfer from reference material CRM470 to the calibrator was less than 0.8%, significantly lower than the reference material's uncertainty (3.7%).
Process parameter variation within the simulation model enabled optimization, maintaining low added uncertainty.
Calibrator uncertainty contributed minimally to overall patient result uncertainty.

Conclusions:

The Monte Carlo simulation method is a powerful tool for estimating calibrator uncertainty in complex processes.
This approach facilitates process optimization, reducing measurement and reagent costs while meeting uncertainty requirements.
The developed method expands upon existing techniques, offering a robust solution for complex value-assignment uncertainty estimation.