Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Car seat or car bed for very low birth weight infants at discharge home
Walid A Salhab1, Asif Khattak, Jon E Tyson
1Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA. walid.salhab@UTsouthwestern.edu
Insights
Car beds do not reduce the risk of apnea, bradycardia, or desaturation in preterm infants compared to car seats. Continuous monitoring is essential for very low birth weight infants during travel in either device.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal care
- Pediatric transport safety
- Infant respiratory and cardiovascular monitoring
Background:
- Preterm infants, especially those with very low birth weight (<1500g), are at increased risk for cardiorespiratory events.
- The safety of infant transport devices, such as car seats and car beds, is crucial for this vulnerable population.
- Understanding the comparative incidence of adverse events in different transport devices is essential for clinical guidance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the incidence of apnea, bradycardia, or desaturation between car seats and car beds in preterm very low birth weight infants.
- To identify risk factors associated with adverse events in these transport devices.
- To inform recommendations for safe infant travel.
Main Methods:
- A comparative study involving 151 preterm very low birth weight infants.
- Infants were monitored for 120 minutes in both a car seat and a car bed.
- Apnea, bradycardia, desaturation, and absent nasal airflow were the primary monitored events.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in the incidence of adverse events (15% in car seats vs. 19% in car beds, P=.4) was observed between the two devices.
- Time to the first event was similar for both the car seat and car bed.
- Bronchopulmonary dysplasia predicted car seat events, while lower gestational age predicted car bed events.
Conclusions:
- There is no evidence to suggest that car beds are safer than car seats regarding cardiorespiratory events in preterm very low birth weight infants.
- Continuous observation is necessary for very low birth weight infants during travel, regardless of the device used.
- Further research may be needed to optimize infant transport safety for high-risk neonates.
Objective:
To compare the incidence of apnea, bradycardia, or desaturation in a car seat with that in a car bed for preterm very low birth weight (< or = 1500 g) infants.
Study Design:
Infants were studied for 120 minutes in a car seat and in a car bed. Apnea (> 20 seconds), bradycardia (heart rate < 80/min for > 5 seconds), desaturation (SpO2 < 88% for > 10 seconds), and absent nasal flow were monitored.
Results:
We assessed 151 infants (median birth weight, 1120 g [range, 437 to 3105]; median birth gestational age, 29 weeks [24 to 34]) in both devices. Twenty-three infants (15%) had > or = 1 event in the car seat compared with 29 (19%) in the car bed (P = .4). Time to first event was similar in the car seat and car bed (mean, 54 to 55 minutes). In logistic regression analyses, bronchopulmonary dysplasia was a significant predictor for a car seat event and a lower gestational age at birth was a risk factor for a car bed event.
Conclusions:
We found no evidence that an event is less likely in a car bed than in a car seat. Whichever device is used, very low birth weight infants require observation during travel.
Related Concept Videos
Discharge Summary Forms
Here's a detailed look at the key components and guidelines for preparing a discharge summary:
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Decreased Body Temperature
Planning Nursing Care I
Restorative Care
