Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Efficacy and safety testing. The clinical perspective.

J W Fluhr1, M Miteva, P Elsner

  • 1Department of Dermatology, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany.

Current Problems in Dermatology
|February 22, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A re-innervated <i>in vitro</i> skin model of non-histaminergic itch and skin neurogenic inflammation: PAR2-, TRPV1- and TRPA1-agonist induced functionality.

Skin health and disease·2022
Same author

[New specialist training regulations in dermatology: Old wine in new bottles?]

Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete·2021
Same author

Validation of questionnaire algorithm based on repeated open application testing with the constituents of fragrance mix II: the EDEN Fragrance Study.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2021
Same author

[Pre- and post-interventional skin care for laser and peel treatments].

Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete·2021
Same author

Relationship between sensitive skin and sleep disorders, fatigue, dust, sweating, food, tobacco consumption or female hormonal changes: Results from a worldwide survey of 10 743 individuals.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2021
Same author

[Phototherapy in the "City of Light" Jena].

Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete·2020
Same journal

Microblading Technique for Tattooing of "Hairstrokes" That Simulate Natural Hair: Eyebrow Tattooing and Correction of Medical Conditions.

Current problems in dermatology·2023
Same journal

Preface.

Current problems in dermatology·2023
Same journal

On the Use, Effectiveness, and Safety of Face Masks, Gloves, and Disinfectants to Prevent Transfer of Microbials between the Tattooist and the Customer: A Practical Review of Pros and Cons Including the Occupational Safety of the Tattooist.

Current problems in dermatology·2023
Same journal

Linearity and Surface Anatomy of the Face: From Embryo to Senescence.

Current problems in dermatology·2023
Same journal

Stretch Mark Treatment by Tattooing and Microneedling.

Current problems in dermatology·2023
Same journal

Auxiliary Utensils in Cosmetic and Medical Tattoo Settings.

Current problems in dermatology·2023
See all related articles

New workplace substances require advanced safety testing. In vitro and in vivo methods are crucial for evaluating barrier creams and skin protection products, ensuring safety and efficacy.

Area of Science:

  • Occupational health and safety
  • Dermatology
  • Toxicology

Background:

  • Increasing workplace substances necessitate adaptive safety testing protocols.
  • Traditional in vivo studies are often impractical for novel substances like cutting fluids.
  • In vitro models offer a safe, rapid, and effective alternative for initial screening.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review current methodologies for evaluating skin protection products.
  • To highlight the importance of both in vitro and in vivo testing for assessing cutaneous reactions.
  • To provide an overview of safety testing approaches for topical formulations.

Main Methods:

  • In vitro models for initial screening of barrier creams.
  • Non-invasive bioengineering methods for assessing inflammatory responses.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Clinical scoring for evaluating irritation and allergic reactions.
  • Stepwise safety testing incorporating various in vitro and in vivo models.

    • Main Results:

    • In vitro tests are recommended for screening barrier cream candidates due to their simplicity and safety.
    • No universally accepted procedure currently exists for evaluating skin protection products.
    • Accurate assessment of inflammatory responses can be achieved through non-invasive bioengineering and clinical scoring.

    Conclusions:

    • A combination of in vitro and in vivo testing is essential for comprehensive safety evaluation of skin protection products.
    • Clinical testing is vital to verify the propensity of topical products to cause cutaneous reactions.
    • Safety testing requires a stepwise approach to address potential biological and toxicological effects.