Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model01:15

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

The case management model is a multidisciplinary approach that involves healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines, such as physicians, nurses, therapists, social workers, and pharmacists, working collaboratively to address the various needs of patients. Each healthcare professional brings unique expertise and perspectives, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the patient's condition and tailoring treatment plans accordingly.
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions01:29

Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions

Creating and executing a nursing diagnosis helps nurses plan care and guide patient, family, and community interventions. They are developed based on a patient's physical evaluation and support measuring the outcomes. It is not recommended to select random interventions throughout the planning process. Instead, consider the following six essential factors when choosing interventions:
Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System01:26

Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System

At the different levels of the healthcare system, we see varying methods of healthcare used. These methods include managed care systems, case management, and primary healthcare.
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is limited...
Nursing Evaluation01:15

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
Section...
Methods of Documentation V: CBE01:23

Methods of Documentation V: CBE

Charting by Exception, or CBE, is a method of documentation used in healthcare, particularly in nursing, that focuses on documenting only significant or abnormal findings rather than recording every detail. This approach aims to streamline the documentation process, improve efficiency, and ensure that healthcare providers can quickly identify deviations from normalcy in patient assessments.
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Empirical meropenem versus piperacillin/tazobactam for adult patients with sepsis (EMPRESS) trial: Protocol.

Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica·2024
Same author

Piperacillin/tazobactam versus carbapenems in patients with severe bacterial infections: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica·2023
Same author

Cost of Treating Skin Problems in Patients with Diabetes Who Use Insulin Pumps and/or Glucose Sensors.

Diabetes technology & therapeutics·2019
Same author

Piperacillin/tazobactam vs carbapenems for patients with bacterial infection: Protocol for a systematic review.

Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica·2019
Same author

Topical application of recombinant activated factor VII during cesarean delivery for placenta previa.

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology·2017
Same author

Computed tomography versus invasive coronary angiography: design and methods of the pragmatic randomised multicentre DISCHARGE trial.

European radiology·2016

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
10:38

Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies

Published on: January 16, 2019

[Methods for cost-effectiveness evaluation of intensive care].

Lars Heslet1, Jakob Steen Andersen, Hans Keiding

  • 1Rigshospitalet, Intensiv Terapiafdeling ITA 4131, København Ø. heslet@image.dk

Ugeskrift for Laeger
|February 23, 2007
PubMed
Summary

Cost-effectiveness analyses are crucial for understanding the link between treatment quality and the costs of intensive care. Including societal health outcomes is vital for accurate evaluations of critically-ill patient care.

More Related Videos

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
06:16

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease

Published on: August 9, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
10:38

Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies

Published on: January 16, 2019

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
06:16

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease

Published on: August 9, 2024

Area of Science:

  • Health Economics
  • Critical Care Medicine
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Intensive care costs pose a significant challenge to healthcare systems.
  • Cost-effectiveness evaluations are increasingly important due to political strategies promoting competition and quality documentation.
  • Current analyses often use hospital-centric surrogate markers, neglecting broader societal health impacts.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To emphasize the importance of including societal quality variables in cost-effectiveness analyses for critically-ill patients.
  • To clarify the association between treatment quality and costs in intensive care settings.
  • To advocate for a societal perspective in cost-effectiveness evaluations.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing cost-effectiveness analysis methodologies in critical care.
  • Analysis of the limitations of hospital-based surrogate markers (e.g., organ failure, length of stay).
  • Conceptual framework development for integrating societal health status into cost-effectiveness evaluations.

Main Results:

  • Hospital-based surrogate markers inadequately represent the true health outcomes valued by society.
  • A societal perspective is essential for a comprehensive understanding of cost-effectiveness in intensive care.
  • Current methodologies may underestimate the value of high-quality critical care when societal benefits are excluded.

Conclusions:

  • Cost-effectiveness analyses in intensive care must adopt a societal perspective.
  • Integrating quality variables that reflect patient health status is crucial for accurate evaluations.
  • Accurate cost-effectiveness evaluations are essential for optimizing resource allocation and improving outcomes for critically-ill patients.