Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System01:26

Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System

At the different levels of the healthcare system, we see varying methods of healthcare used. These methods include managed care systems, case management, and primary healthcare.
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is limited...
International Nursing Organizations II01:28

International Nursing Organizations II

The World Health Organization (WHO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations based in Geneva. The WHO has many initiatives that center around health. Primarily, they lead global efforts to expand universal health coverage using science-based policies and programs. They are also responsible for shaping health research agendas and developing norms and standards.
The WHO provides expert team support, including funding, vaccines, testing, and treatment tools at the country level to fight...
Primary Healthcare Services01:30

Primary Healthcare Services

Primary care promotes wellness and prevents disease. This care includes health promotion, education, protection (such as immunizations), early disease screening, and environmental considerations. Settings providing this type of healthcare include physician offices, public health clinics, school nursing, and community health nursing.
In 1978, international leaders convened in Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, for what would be a pivotal event in global health. The Alma-Ata Declaration was the first to call...
Community Based Intervention01:30

Community Based Intervention

Community-based interventions in mental health represent a paradigm shift from institution-centered care to treatments embedded within the fabric of local communities. By prioritizing inclusion and leveraging existing societal structures, this approach fosters a supportive environment conducive to addressing mental health challenges while promoting individual dignity and agency.
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention01:26

Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention

Health promotion allows a person to control the determinants of health, resulting in an improved health status. It enhances the quality of life and reduces premature deaths. Health promotion and illness prevention programs help people make beneficial choices to reduce the risk of disease and disabilities. There are three health promotion and illness prevention levels: primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention.
In primary prevention, actions taken before disease onset prevent the disease from...
Nursing Evaluation01:15

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
Section...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A systems approach to understanding injury care in LMICs using causal loop diagrams.

BMJ global health·2026
Same author

A qualitative study of the lived experiences of working age adults living with adventitious total bilateral blindness in Nigeria.

Global public health·2026
Same author

Evaluating the implementation of the vignettes-based injury care process assessment tool in low- and middle-income countries settings.

BMC health services research·2026
Same author

Community and health systems learning: critical realist evaluation of the VAPAR 'learning platform' in rural South Africa 2015-25.

Wellcome open research·2026
Same author

How does the Nigerian health system serve people living with disabilities? A socio-ecological analysis on people living with visual impairment.

Global health action·2025
Same author

Factors influencing health service utilisation among older adults in the Tamale metropolis: a cross-sectional study based on Andersen's behavioural model.

BMC geriatrics·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 16, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

Setting priorities for safe motherhood programme evaluation: a participatory process in three developing countries.

Banyana Cecilia Madi1, Julia Hussein, Sennen Hounton

  • 1IMMPACT University of Aberdeen, Department of Public Health, United Kingdom. banyana@bcmadi.com

Health Policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
|February 23, 2007
PubMed
Summary

Participatory priority setting for program evaluation, especially in low-income countries, enhances resource allocation. Collaborative research agendas ensure rigorous studies address local priorities for safe motherhood programs.

More Related Videos

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 16, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Health Systems Research
  • Program Evaluation

Background:

  • Effective resource allocation and efficient use of scarce resources are critical in low-income countries.
  • Collaborative research agendas involving researchers, managers, policymakers, and stakeholders can ensure rigorous studies on local priorities.
  • Participatory priority setting in program evaluation is crucial but under-documented, particularly for maternal health programs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe a participatory process for eliciting and prioritizing evaluation needs for safe motherhood programs in three developing countries.
  • To demonstrate the implementation of stakeholder engagement in setting evaluation priorities.
  • To identify contextually relevant evaluation questions for safe motherhood initiatives.

Main Methods:

  • A 36-month series of iterative consultations and participatory workshops with safe motherhood stakeholders in three developing countries.
  • Eliciting stakeholder views on evaluation and contextual factors.
  • Identifying, refining, and finalizing evaluation priorities and research questions through consensus.

Main Results:

  • Three evaluation questions were identified in each country, with one selected for full-scale evaluation.
  • The participatory process resulted in both globally and contextually relevant evaluation priorities.
  • Despite high investment, the process yielded valuable, actionable evaluation priorities.

Conclusions:

  • Participatory priority setting in program evaluation, while resource-intensive, leads to relevant and impactful research agendas.
  • This approach can effectively bridge the research-policy interface in public health, particularly for maternal health.
  • The described methodology offers practical lessons for implementing stakeholder-driven evaluation in resource-limited settings.