Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Robotic control in knee joint replacement surgery.

B L Davies1, F M Rodriguez y Baena, A R W Barrett

  • 1Mechatronics in Medicine Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK. b.davies@imperial.ac.uk

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of Engineering in Medicine
|February 24, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Rare and declining bird species benefit most from designating protected areas for conservation in the UK.

Nature ecology & evolution·2022
Same author

Hip capsule biomechanics after arthroplasty: the effect of implant, approach, and surgical repair.

The bone & joint journal·2019
Same author

Standardizing compression testing for measuring the stiffness of human bone.

Bone & joint research·2018
Same author

Do patient-specific instruments (PSI) for UKA allow non-expert surgeons to achieve the same saw cut accuracy as expert surgeons?

Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery·2018
Same author

Microindentation - a tool for measuring cortical bone stiffness? A systematic review.

Bone & joint research·2017
Same author

Letter to the Editor regarding 'How symmetric are metal-on-metal hip resurfacing patients during gait? Insights for the rehabilitation'.

Journal of biomechanics·2017

Robotic systems in knee arthroplasty offer potential benefits over conventional surgery. This study highlights the need for accuracy measures to quickly assess robotic surgery efficacy for knee replacement.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Robotics in Medicine
  • Medical Technology

Background:

  • Robotic systems in knee arthroplasty have evolved from autonomous to 'hands-on' cost-effective models.
  • Justification for robotic systems requires clear benefits over navigation systems.
  • Recent advancements include smaller robotic systems for knee arthroplasty.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a history and overview of robotic systems in knee arthroplasty.
  • To compare autonomous and 'hands-on' robotic systems.
  • To present results from a trial comparing robotic unicondylar knee arthroplasty with conventional surgery.

Main Methods:

  • Review of historical robotic systems in knee arthroplasty.
  • Description of newer, smaller robotic systems.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Prospective randomized controlled trial using the ACROBOT system for unicondylar knee arthroplasty.

    • Main Results:

    • The ACROBOT system was compared to conventional surgery in a trial.
    • Results of the trial are presented.
    • Discussion on the necessity of immediate accuracy measures for robotic surgery efficacy.

    Conclusions:

    • Robotic systems in knee arthroplasty require clear justification and demonstrated benefits.
    • There is a need for immediate measures of accuracy to assess robotic surgery efficacy.
    • Long-term clinical improvements should not be the sole indicator of robotic surgery success.