Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The intact meniscus and an artificial meniscus prosthesis both act as a shock absorber in the knee joint.

The Knee·2026
Same author

How many people in the Netherlands live with a hip, knee, or shoulder replacement?

Bone & joint open·2025
Same author

Exploring healthy knee kinematic phenotypes obtained through dynamic CT imaging: A cluster analysis study.

Journal of biomechanics·2024
Same author

The predictive value and reliability of ultrasound-guided synovial aspiration and biopsies for diagnosing periprosthetic shoulder infections.

Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery·2024
Same author

Survival of cemented short Exeter femoral components in primary total hip arthroplasty.

The bone & joint journal·2024
Same author

A mapping review on preoperative prognostic factors and outcome measures of revision total knee arthroplasty.

Bone & joint open·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 16, 2026

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
11:51

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage

Published on: February 10, 2014

Technical factors affecting cup stability in bone impaction grafting.

S B T Bolder1, N Verdonschot, B W Schreurs

  • 1Department of Orthopaedics, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of Engineering in Medicine
|February 24, 2007
PubMed
Summary

The original bone impaction technique provides superior initial stability for acetabular reconstruction compared to the reversed reaming slurry graft method. Reversed reaming is not recommended for acetabular defects.

More Related Videos

Biological Compatibility Profile on Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration
10:28

Biological Compatibility Profile on Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration

Published on: November 16, 2018

Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
07:42

Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material

Published on: December 20, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 16, 2026

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
11:51

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage

Published on: February 10, 2014

Biological Compatibility Profile on Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration
10:28

Biological Compatibility Profile on Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration

Published on: November 16, 2018

Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
07:42

Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material

Published on: December 20, 2024

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic surgery
  • Biomaterials science
  • Surgical techniques

Background:

  • Acetabular bone stock deficiency presents challenges in hip reconstruction.
  • Traditional bone impaction grafting offers favorable long-term outcomes.
  • Alternative methods for bone graft preparation are being explored.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the initial stability of two bone grafting techniques for acetabular defects.
  • To evaluate the efficacy of manual impaction of large bone grafts versus reversed reaming of slurry grafts.
  • To assess reconstruction techniques in conjunction with cemented acetabular cups.

Main Methods:

  • An artificial acetabular cavitary defect model was utilized.
  • Two reconstruction techniques were compared: manual impaction of large grafts and reversed reaming of slurry grafts.
  • Mechanical testing involved sequentially increasing dynamic loads.
  • Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA) assessed initial cup stability.

Main Results:

  • Cups reconstructed with slurry grafts and reversed reaming showed significantly less initial stability.
  • The original bone impaction technique with large grafts yielded optimal initial stability.
  • Reversed reaming of slurry grafts resulted in inferior mechanical performance.

Conclusions:

  • The original bone impaction technique with firm impaction of large bone grafts is superior for achieving initial stability in acetabular reconstruction.
  • The reversed reaming technique for slurry bone grafts is not recommended for addressing acetabular defects due to compromised stability.