Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Atom Probe Tomography Analysis of Exsolved Mineral Phases
Published on: October 25, 2019
Geometry, charge distribution, and surface speciation of phosphate on goethite
Rasoul Rahnemaie1, Tjisse Hiemstra, Willem H van Riemsdijk
1Department of Soil Quality, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 8005, 6700 EC Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Abstract:
The surface speciation of phosphate has been evaluated with surface complexation modeling using an interfacial charge distribution (CD) approach based on ion adsorption and ordering of interfacial water. In the CD model, the charge of adsorbed ions is distributed over two electrostatic potentials in the double-layer profile. The CD is related to the structure of the surface complex. A new approach is followed in which the CD values of the various surface complexes have been calculated theoretically from the geometries of the surface complexes. Molecular orbital calculations based on density functional theory (MO/DFT) have been used to optimize the structure of a series of hydrated surface complexes of phosphate. These theoretical CD values are corrected for dipole orientation effects. Data analysis of the PO4 adsorption, applying the independently derived CD coefficients, resolves the presence of two dominant surface species. A nonprotonated bidentate (B) complex is dominant over a broad range of pH values at low loading (< or =1.5 micromol/m(2)). For low pH and high loading, a strong contribution of a singly protonated monodentate (MH or MH-Na) complex is found, which differs from earlier interpretations. For the conditions studied, the doubly protonated bidentate (BH2) and monodentate (MH2) surface complexes and the nonprotonated monodentate (M) complex are not significant contributors. These findings are discussed qualitatively and quantitatively in relation to published experimental in-situ CIR-FTIR data and theoretical MO/DFT-IR information. The relative variation in the peak intensities as a function of pH and loading approximately agrees with the surface speciation calculated with the CD model. The model correctly predicts the proton co-adsorption of phosphate binding on goethite and the shift of the IEP at low phosphate loading (< or =1.5 micromol/m(2)). At higher loading, it deviates.
More Related Videos
08:21Optimized Procedure for Determining the Adsorption of Phosphonates onto Granular Ferric Hydroxide using a Miniaturized Phosphorus Determination Method
Published on: May 18, 2018
11:50Metal-silicate Partitioning at High Pressure and Temperature: Experimental Methods and a Protocol to Suppress Highly Siderophile Element Inclusions
Published on: June 13, 2015
Related Concept Videos
The Electrical Double Layer
The Phosphorus Cycle
Processes at Electrodes
Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...
Roles of Electrolytes: Calcium and Phosphate
The calcium concentration in blood plasma is primarily regulated...