Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evoked cochlear potentials in the barn owl.

Christine Köppl1, Otto Gleich

  • 1Lehrstuhl für Zoologie, Technische Universität München, Lichtenbergstr. 4, 85747 Garching, Germany. ckoeppl@physiol.usyd.edu.au

Journal of Comparative Physiology. A, Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology
|February 24, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Auditory perception and neural representation of temporal features are altered by age but not by cochlear synaptopathy.

eLife·2026
Same author

Degeneration of the stria vascularis in quiet-aged gerbils: Linking structural, cellular and molecular changes to cochlear function.

Neurobiology of aging·2025
Same author

Notched noise reveals differential improvement in the neural representation of the sound envelope.

Communications biology·2025
Same author

Comparative approaches to investigate the principles of hearing.

Hearing research·2025
Same author

When dinosaurs hear like barn owls: pitfalls and caveats in assessing hearing in dinosaurs.

Biology letters·2025
Same author

Measurement of inferior colliculus volume based on MRI image stacks and its relationship with age and hearing status.

PloS one·2025

This study measured electrical responses in barn owl ears, distinguishing between cochlear microphonic (CM) and compound action potential (CAP). Findings reveal the CAP originates from neural activity and reflects tonotopic organization in the auditory system.

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Bioelectricity
  • Animal Models

Background:

  • Understanding auditory system function requires characterizing electrical potentials generated by the cochlea.
  • Differentiating between neural and non-neural electrical responses is crucial for interpreting auditory function.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To separately evaluate cochlear microphonic (CM) and compound action potential (CAP) responses in barn owls.
  • To investigate the origin and tonotopic organization of the CAP.
  • To compare CM and CAP sensitivity across frequencies.

Main Methods:

  • Adult barn owls were used to record gross electrical responses to tone bursts via a round window electrode.
  • Cochlear microphonic (CM) and compound action potential (CAP) were assessed.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Selective abolishment of neural responses was used to differentiate CAP and CM origins.

    • Main Results:

    • The CAP was confirmed as neural in origin, while CM remained unaffected by selective neural abolishment.
    • CAP latencies decreased with increasing stimulus frequency, indicating tonotopic mapping.
    • CAP amplitudes correlated with afferent fiber density, suggesting local origin along the basilar papilla.
    • Audiograms from CAP and CM showed optimal sensitivity in a broad frequency range, similar to behavioral data but with higher absolute sensitivity.

    Conclusions:

    • The compound action potential (CAP) in barn owls originates from neural activity and exhibits tonotopic organization.
    • Electrical recordings provide insights into auditory system function and sensitivity.
    • The study highlights the utility of CM and CAP measurements for understanding auditory processing in birds.