A consensus process for identifying a prioritised list of study questions
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Martin Utley1, Steve Gallivan, Mary Mills
1Clinical Operational Research Unit, University College London, Gower Street, London WCIE 6BT, UK m.utley@ucl.ac.uk
Abstract:
A consensus process has been developed to assist the UK National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death in identifying questions to be addressed in its studies. The process utilises the knowledge and experience of a panel of experts via a facilitated brainstorming exercise and employs a robust voting system to produce a list of candidate questions ordered in terms of the preferences expressed by individual panel members. The process which is described has been used successfully to assist the design of two national studies and it is anticipated that the process will be adopted for many studies in the future.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Drug Discovery: Overview
Preclinical Development: Overview
Surveys
Study Design in Statistics
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
