Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Representing causation.

Phillip Wolff1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. pwolff@emory.edu

Journal of Experimental Psychology. General
|February 28, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a dynamics model of causation, viewing it as forces and motion. This model explains how we infer causality from single events and extends to social interactions.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Predicting amyloid status in Primary Progressive Aphasia using explainable artificial intelligence.

NPJ dementia·2026
Same author

Data analysis strategies for the Accelerating Medicines Partnership® Schizophrenia Program.

Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)·2025
Same author

Enabling FAIR data stewardship in complex international multi-site studies: Data Operations for the Accelerating Medicines Partnership® Schizophrenia Program.

Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)·2025
Same author

Artificial intelligence classifies primary progressive aphasia from connected speech.

Brain : a journal of neurology·2024
Same author

Using explainable artificial intelligence to identify linguistic biomarkers of amyloid pathology in primary progressive aphasia.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2024
Same author

Accelerating Medicines Partnership® Schizophrenia (AMP® SCZ): Rationale and Study Design of the Largest Global Prospective Cohort Study of Clinical High Risk for Psychosis.

Schizophrenia bulletin·2024
Same journal

Executive function and social behavior: Causal evidence from loading working memory and inhibitory control.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

Correction to "Your research is public engagement: A case for more intentional science communication in research with human subjects" by Vaughn (2026).

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

Correction to "Costs and benefits of acting extraverted: A randomized controlled trial" by Jacques-Hamilton et al. (2019).

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

Conveying (discrete) emotionality with novel words.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

Physical actions shape moral choices: Environment-directed movements reduce cheating in young children.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

From chunks to schemas: Learning in the Hebb repetition paradigm.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychology
  • Physics

Background:

  • Traditional models of causation often rely on counterfactual or probabilistic reasoning.
  • A gap exists in understanding how humans induce causal relationships from limited observations.
  • Force dynamics offers a potential framework for a more nuanced understanding of causation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and validate a dynamics model of causation based on force dynamics theory.
  • To demonstrate how this model distinguishes between different causal concepts.
  • To explore the model's applicability to social causation and its implications for time.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a dynamics model of causation rooted in L. Talmy's force dynamics theory.
  • Utilized a physics simulator to generate 3-D animations of object interactions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Conducted experiments where participants categorized these animations to assess causal judgments.

    • Main Results:

    • Causal judgments were found to be influenced by multiple forces, not a single one.
    • Participants employed a qualitative decision rule to compute the resultant of forces.
    • The dynamics model successfully extended to represent social causation.

    Conclusions:

    • The dynamics model provides a robust framework for understanding physical and social causation.
    • It offers a natural explanation for inferring causality from single observations.
    • This approach has implications for understanding the interplay between causation and time.