Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Atomic Force Microscopy01:08

Atomic Force Microscopy

Atomic force microscopy (AFM) is a type of scanning probe microscopy that can analyze topographic details of various specimens like ceramics, glass, polymers, and biological samples. AFM offers over 1000 times more resolution than the optical imaging system. Images generated from AFM are three-dimensional surface profiles, offering an advantage over the flat, two-dimensional images from other imaging techniques.
The AFM Probe
The probe is regarded as the heart of any AFM setup and comprises the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Clinical, radiographic, and esthetic outcomes of the socket shield technique versus conventional postextraction implant placement: A systematic review.

The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·2026
Same author

Transport Coherence Loss in Heterogeneous Forward Osmosis Membranes: A Hierarchical Diagnostic Framework.

Membranes·2026
Same author

Tunable Lower Critical Fractal Dimension for a Nonequilibrium Phase Transition.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Histological evaluation of the soft tissue response to plasma-activated healing abutments: A prospective controlled clinical trial.

Journal of prosthodontic research·2026
Same author

Exact Duality at Low Energy in a Josephson Tunnel Junction Coupled to a Transmission Line.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Clinical outcomes of post-extractive tissue-level implants with transmucosal zirconia collar: a prospective cohort study.

Oral and maxillofacial surgery·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Application of Atomic Force Microscopy to Detect Early Osteoarthritis
09:22

Application of Atomic Force Microscopy to Detect Early Osteoarthritis

Published on: May 24, 2020

Biomaterials for orthopedics: a roughness analysis by atomic force microscopy.

Ugo Covani1, Luca Giacomelli, Adriano Krajewski

  • 1Nanoworld Institute--CIRNNOB and Biophysics Division, University of Genova, Corso Europa 30, 16132 Genova, Italy.

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part A
|February 28, 2007
PubMed
Summary

Bioactive materials, like hydroxyapatite and bioactive glasses, show higher roughness than titanium for bone reconstruction. Specific bioactive glasses, RKKP and AP40, exhibit significant roughness at nanoscale, enhancing osteoblast adhesion and biointegration.

More Related Videos

Addressing Practical Issues in Atomic Force Microscopy-Based Micro-Indentation on Human Articular Cartilage Explants
08:06

Addressing Practical Issues in Atomic Force Microscopy-Based Micro-Indentation on Human Articular Cartilage Explants

Published on: October 28, 2022

Multimodal Approach to Assess Bone Regeneration and Scaffold Performance
06:54

Multimodal Approach to Assess Bone Regeneration and Scaffold Performance

Published on: February 13, 2026

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Application of Atomic Force Microscopy to Detect Early Osteoarthritis
09:22

Application of Atomic Force Microscopy to Detect Early Osteoarthritis

Published on: May 24, 2020

Addressing Practical Issues in Atomic Force Microscopy-Based Micro-Indentation on Human Articular Cartilage Explants
08:06

Addressing Practical Issues in Atomic Force Microscopy-Based Micro-Indentation on Human Articular Cartilage Explants

Published on: October 28, 2022

Multimodal Approach to Assess Bone Regeneration and Scaffold Performance
06:54

Multimodal Approach to Assess Bone Regeneration and Scaffold Performance

Published on: February 13, 2026

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Surface Science
  • Orthopedic Materials

Background:

  • Bone reconstruction relies on materials with optimal surface properties for biointegration.
  • Surface roughness significantly influences cellular response and implant performance.
  • Understanding material topography is crucial for developing advanced orthopedic implants.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantitatively assess and compare the surface roughness of seven common bone reconstruction materials using Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM).
  • To investigate the relationship between surface topography, particularly nanoscale roughness, and biointegration potential.
  • To evaluate novel bioactive glasses for orthopedic applications based on their surface characteristics.

Main Methods:

  • Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) was employed to measure surface roughness parameters, including Root Mean Square (RMS) and RMS/average height (AH) ratio.
  • Measurements were conducted across various dimensional scales, from 100 square microns down to hundreds of nanometers.
  • Comparative analysis of roughness profiles for titanium, hydroxyapatite, bioactive glasses (AP40, RKKP, RBP1, RBP2), and other materials.

Main Results:

  • Titanium consistently exhibited lower surface roughness compared to other materials, often with statistical significance.
  • Bioactive materials, including hydroxyapatite and bioactive glasses, demonstrated significantly higher overall roughness.
  • RKKP and AP40 bioactive glasses showed markedly increased roughness at lower dimensional ranges (nanoscale), correlating with increased surface area.

Conclusions:

  • Nanoscale surface roughness of bioactive glasses is a critical factor promoting osteoblast adhesion, growth, and protein absorption, thereby enhancing biointegration.
  • The surface structure of bioactive glasses, influenced by chemical composition, plays a dual role in biointegration through direct chemical interactions and indirect effects on tribological behavior.
  • New bioactive glasses (RBP1, RBP2) show promise for orthopedic applications, warranting further investigation based on their tailored surface properties.