Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Biosensor for Detection of Antibiotic Resistant Staphylococcus Bacteria
Published on: May 8, 2013
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization in veterinary personnel
Beth A Hanselman1, Steve A Kruth, Joyce Rousseau
1Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada. bhansel@uoguelph.ca
Abstract:
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was isolated from nares of 27/417 (6.5%) attendees at an international veterinary conference: 23/345 (7.0%) veterinarians, 4/34 (12.0%) technicians, and 0/38 others. Colonization was more common for large-animal (15/96, 15.6%) than small-animal personnel (12/271, 4.4%) or those with no animal patient contact (0/50) (p<0.001). Large-animal practice was the only variable significantly associated with colonization (odds ratio 2.9; 95% confidence interval 1.2-6.6). Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis identified 2 predominant clones with similar distribution among veterinarians as previously reported for horses and companion animals. Canadian epidemic MRSA-2 (CMRSA) was isolated from 11 small-animal and 2 large-animal personnel from the United States (n = 12) and Germany (n = 1). In contrast, CMRSA-5 was isolated exclusively from large-animal personnel (p<0.001) in the United States (n = 10), United Kingdom (n = 2), and Denmark (n = 1). MRSA colonization may be an occupational risk for veterinary professionals.
Insights
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is present in veterinary professionals, particularly those working with large animals. This finding suggests MRSA colonization may pose an occupational risk in the veterinary field.
Area of Science:
- Veterinary Medicine
- Infectious Diseases
- Public Health
Background:
- Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a significant pathogen in both human and animal health.
- Understanding MRSA colonization in veterinary professionals is crucial for infection control.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the prevalence of MRSA nasal colonization among attendees at an international veterinary conference.
- To identify risk factors associated with MRSA colonization in this population.
Main Methods:
- Nasal swabs were collected from conference attendees.
- MRSA presence was confirmed using standard microbiological techniques.
- Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was employed to analyze MRSA strains.
Main Results:
- Overall MRSA colonization rate was 6.5% (27/417).
- Colonization was significantly higher in large-animal personnel (15.6%) compared to small-animal personnel (4.4%).
- Large-animal practice was the only significant risk factor (OR 2.9).
- Two predominant MRSA clones were identified, with distinct distributions related to animal contact and geographic origin.
Conclusions:
- MRSA colonization is prevalent in veterinary professionals, especially those in large-animal practice.
- Veterinary professionals, particularly those working with large animals, may face an occupational risk of MRSA colonization.
- Further research into MRSA transmission dynamics in veterinary settings is warranted.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance
Staphylococcal Skin Infections
Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA
Defense Against Bacterial Pathogens
Phagocytes
Phagocytes are the frontline soldiers of the immune system. They include neutrophils and macrophages. Neutrophils are the most abundant type of white blood cell and are quickly mobilized to the site of infection. Macrophages are larger cells that patrol...
