Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Discrepancy processes in prospective memory retrieval.

Jennifer E Breneiser1, Mark A McDaniel

  • 1Department of Psychology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130-4899, USA. jebrenei@artsci.wustl.edu

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|March 3, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Long-Term Forgetting Rates Vary by Bloom's Taxonomy Levels but Not Initial Learning in DPT Education.

Physical therapy·2025
Same author

Individual Differences in Student Learning: A Comparison Between the Student Approaches to Learning and Concept-Building Frameworks.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Terracotta: A tool for conducting experimental research on student learning.

Behavior research methods·2023
Same author

Learning Introductory Biology: Students' Concept-Building Approaches Predict Transfer on Biology Exams.

CBE life sciences education·2022
Same author

Individual Differences in Structure Building: Impacts on Comprehension and Learning, Theoretical Underpinnings, and Support for Less Able Structure Builders.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2021
Same author

Effects of feature highlighting and causal explanations on category learning in a natural-science domain.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2021

Discrepancy processes improve prospective memory. Higher target item discrepancy in ongoing tasks leads to better prospective memory performance, supporting discrepancy theory.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Memory Studies

Background:

  • Prospective memory involves remembering to perform intended actions in the future.
  • Discrepancy processes have been theorized to aid in detecting prospective memory targets.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of discrepancy in prospective memory performance.
  • To examine how the discrepancy of targets from ongoing task processing affects prospective memory.

Main Methods:

  • Participants were assigned to either a high or low discrepancy group based on target item preexposure frequency.
  • The ongoing task involved processing items with varying degrees of discrepancy from the prospective memory target.

Main Results:

  • Prospective memory performance was significantly better in the high-discrepancy group compared to the low-discrepancy group.

Related Experiment Videos

  • This suggests that greater discrepancy enhances the detection of prospective memory targets.

    • Conclusions:

    • The findings support the discrepancy view of prospective remembering.
    • Increased discrepancy between ongoing task processing and memory targets facilitates prospective memory recall.