Related Experiment Videos
Pediatric renal transplants--results with sequential immunosuppression.
P S Almond1, A J Matas, K Gillingham
1Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455.
Transplantation
|January 1, 1992
Summary
Sequential immunosuppression with Cyclosporine (CsA) significantly improved pediatric renal transplant outcomes, enhancing patient and graft survival rates. This approach led to better graft survival and fewer rejections compared to older methods.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Immunosuppression Therapy
- Pediatric Transplantation
Background:
- Cyclosporine (CsA) has revolutionized renal transplantation outcomes.
- Sequential immunosuppression protocols, including CsA, were implemented in pediatric renal transplant recipients starting in 1984.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the outcomes of pediatric renal transplants using a sequential immunosuppression protocol involving Cyclosporine (CsA).
- To compare these outcomes with historical data from transplants performed without CsA.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective study of 131 pediatric renal transplants (age ≤ 18) performed between June 1984 and March 1991 using sequential immunosuppression (MALG, AZA, P, delayed CsA).
- Comparison with 144 pediatric renal transplants performed since January 1980 without CsA.
- Analysis of graft survival, patient survival, hospital readmissions, rejection episodes, and serum creatinine levels.
Main Results:
- The sequential immunosuppression group showed a 1-year actuarial graft survival of 93% and 100% patient survival.
- Compared to the non-CsA group (82% graft survival, 94% patient survival), sequential immunosuppression significantly improved patient (P = 0.003) and graft survival (P = 0.004).
- No significant differences were observed in readmissions, rejection episodes, or serum creatinine levels between the two groups.
Conclusions:
- Sequential immunosuppression with Cyclosporine (CsA) significantly enhances patient and graft survival in pediatric renal transplantation.
- While CsA improved survival rates, it did not significantly alter readmission rates, rejection episodes, or renal function compared to non-CsA protocols.
- Living donor recipients experienced fewer rejection episodes than cadaveric recipients in the CsA group.