Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Pulsed Wave Doppler Assessment of Diastolic Dysfunction in the ZSF-1 Rat Model of Pulmonary Hypertension Due to Left Heart Disease
Published on: May 22, 2026
Circumferential versus longitudinal systolic function in patients with hypertension: a nonlinear relation
Piercarlo Ballo1, Ilaria Quatrini, Elisa Giacomin
1Cardiology Operative Unit, S. Andrea Hospital, La Spezia, Italy. pcballo@tin.it
Insights
In hypertensive patients, left ventricular (LV) systolic function impairment occurs earlier in longitudinal than circumferential performance. The relationship between these functions is nonlinear and depends on LV geometry.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Physiology
- Echocardiography
Background:
- Hypertension is linked to early left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction.
- Both impaired circumferential midwall and longitudinal function are early indicators.
- The interplay between these indices in hypertensive patients remains unexamined.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the relationship between midwall and longitudinal LV function indices in hypertensive patients.
- To investigate how LV geometry influences this relationship.
Main Methods:
- 126 hypertensive patients were studied.
- Measurements included midwall fractional shortening (mFS), stress-corrected mFS, M-mode atrioventricular plane displacement, and tissue Doppler-derived peak mitral annular systolic velocity.
- Regression analysis was used to determine relationships.
Main Results:
- The relationship between midwall and longitudinal indices was nonlinear.
- Reduced longitudinal function (atrioventricular plane displacement, mitral annular systolic velocity) correlated with smaller decreases in mFS, especially at higher ranges.
- Relative wall thickness was the primary determinant of circumferential and longitudinal contraction efficiency.
Conclusions:
- The relationship between circumferential and longitudinal LV function in hypertension is nonlinear and influenced by LV geometry.
- Systolic dysfunction manifests earlier in longitudinal function compared to circumferential function in hypertensive individuals.
Background:
Depressed circumferential midwall performance and impaired left ventricular (LV) longitudinal function are both early markers of LV systolic dysfunction in patients with hypertension. The relation between midwall and longitudinal indices in these patients has never been analyzed.
Methods:
In 126 patients with hypertension, midwall fractional shortening (mFS), stress-corrected mFS, M-mode left atrioventricular plane displacement, and tissue Doppler-derived peak mitral annular systolic velocity were determined.
Results:
Regression analysis showed that the relations of midwall indices to atrioventricular plane displacement and mitral annular systolic velocity were all nonlinear. Reductions in atrioventricular plane displacement or mitral annular systolic velocity within their higher ranges corresponded to relatively smaller decreases in mFS and stress-corrected mFS. Relative wall thickness was the strongest determinant of the relative efficiency of circumferential and longitudinal LV contraction.
Conclusion:
The relation between circumferential midwall and longitudinal function in patients with hypertension is nonlinear and dependent on LV geometry. In these patients, systolic impairment occurs earlier in longitudinal than circumferential performance.
More Related Videos
11:04Quantification of Global Diastolic Function by Kinematic Modeling-based Analysis of Transmitral Flow via the Parametrized Diastolic Filling Formalism
Published on: September 1, 2014
06:18Intravascular Ultrasound Image-Based Finite Element Modeling Approach for Quantifying In Vivo Mechanical Properties of Human Coronary Artery
Published on: December 6, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Measurement of Blood Pressure
Hypertension II: Pathophysiology
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Disorders of the Autonomic Nervous System
Raynaud's disease, also known as Raynaud's phenomenon, is a...
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies