Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Intracardiac atrial defibrillation.

Derek J Dosdall1, Raymond E Ideker

  • 1Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294-0019, USA.

Heart Rhythm
|March 6, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Left bundle branch area pacing preserves mechanical strain and synchrony compared to right ventricular apical pacing in an acute paired preclinical model.

Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing·2026
Same author

Left Bundle Branch Area Antitachycardia Pacing Improves Success Rate Compared to Right Ventricular Antitachycardia Pacing.

JACC. Clinical electrophysiology·2026
Same author

Effect of lead body and helix design variables on implantation success, insertion depth, and muscle torque in the left bundle branch area: Insights from an ex vivo porcine model.

Heart rhythm·2026
Same author

Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Preserves Mechanical Strain and Synchrony Compared to Right Ventricular Apical Pacing in an Acute Paired Preclinical Model.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Effect of Lead Body and Helix Design Variables on Implantation Success, Insertion Depth, and Muscle Torque in Left Bundle Branch Area: Insights from An Ex-Vivo Porcine Model.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Prospective validation of SURPOINT index for creating atrial scar using Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology·2025
Same journal

Conduction Guided Intervention: A First-in-Human Study of CTA-Guided Targeting of Proximal Conduction System Structures.

Heart rhythm·2026
Same journal

Circadian Pattern of Ventricular Fibrillation-Terminating Shocks among Patients with Diagnosed and Treated Congenital Long QT Syndrome.

Heart rhythm·2026
Same journal

High Rates of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Left-Sided Cardiac Surgery in Adults with Congenital Heart Disease.

Heart rhythm·2026
Same journal

Conduction system pacing versus biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: frequentist and bayesian meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial and propensity matched studies.

Heart rhythm·2026
Same journal

Take a Chance? Stroke Risk Management After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation.

Heart rhythm·2026
Same journal

Prominent T-wave induced by Valsalva maneuver associated with a RYR2 loss-of-function variant.

Heart rhythm·2026
See all related articles

Optimizing defibrillation requires a minimum potential gradient. While adding electrodes and sequential shocks can lower energy needs, pain remains a significant issue for atrial defibrillation, limiting clinical practicality.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
  • Medical Device Engineering

Background:

  • Intravascular ventricular and atrial defibrillation share similarities, with potential gradient field crucial for shock outcome.
  • A minimum potential gradient is essential for successful defibrillation in both ventricles and atria.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore factors influencing defibrillation shock effectiveness and energy requirements.
  • To evaluate strategies for reducing defibrillation energy and address pain associated with atrial defibrillation.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of potential gradient field dynamics during defibrillation.
  • Investigation of waveform parameters (duration, tilt, phases) and electrode configurations.
  • Assessment of pain thresholds and clinical practicality of novel defibrillation approaches.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Defibrillation success is linked to achieving a minimum potential gradient.
  • Adding electrodes and using sequential shocks can reduce energy but increases device complexity.
  • Atrial defibrillation shocks are painful even at low energy levels, posing a clinical challenge.

Conclusions:

  • Achieving adequate potential gradient is key for effective defibrillation.
  • While energy reduction strategies exist, patient comfort and device simplicity are critical for clinical adoption, especially for atrial defibrillation.
  • Current advanced electrode configurations for atrial defibrillation are not clinically practical due to pain.