Search research articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Clicker evolution: seeking intelligent design.

Maryfran Barber¹, David Njus

¹Department of Chemistry, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.

CBE Life Sciences Education

|March 7, 2007

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Catecholamines Differ in Their Capacity to Form Melanin.

microPublication biology·2025

Same author

Redox cycling of quinones reduced by ascorbic acid.

Chemico-biological interactions·2023

Same author

Manganese-stimulated redox cycling of dopamine derivatives: Implications for manganism.

Neurotoxicology·2022

Same author

Ascorbic acid: The chemistry underlying its antioxidant properties.

Free radical biology & medicine·2020

Same author

Are Proteinopathy and Oxidative Stress Two Sides of the Same Coin?

Cells·2019

Same author

A theoretical study of ascorbic acid oxidation and HOO˙/O<sub>2</sub>˙<sup>-</sup> radical scavenging.

Organic & biomolecular chemistry·2017

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

The growing number of classroom clicker systems offers choices but pressures universities to standardize. Faculty should lead selection, considering system features and evolving technology for effective classroom response.

Area of Science:

Educational Technology
Classroom Response Systems

Background:

The introduction of low-cost radio-frequency audience response systems (clickers) has led to at least six competing systems in higher education.
Rapid advancements in features and user-friendliness are driven by technological improvements and market competition.
The diversity of clicker systems creates challenges for universities seeking standardization and limiting student expenses.

Purpose of the Study:

To compare the strengths and weaknesses of six prominent clicker systems.
To identify key factors for universities to consider when selecting a classroom response system.
To provide guidance for informed decision-making in adopting educational technology.

Main Methods:

Comparative analysis of six specific audience response systems: eInstruction Classroom Performance System, Qwizdom, TurningPoint, Interwrite PRS, iClicker, and H-ITT.

Related Experiment Videos

Discussion of critical factors influencing the selection process for university-wide adoption.

Evaluation of system features, user-friendliness, and technological evolution.

Main Results:

A variety of clicker systems are available, each with distinct advantages and disadvantages.
The rapid pace of technological development necessitates periodic re-evaluation of chosen systems.
Faculty input is crucial, but student and university IT support involvement is also vital for successful implementation.

Conclusions:

Faculty should spearhead the selection of classroom response systems, fostering a collaborative dialogue with students and university support units.
Strategic selection and regular reassessment of clicker technology are essential for maximizing educational benefits.
Standardization efforts should balance diverse needs with the rapid evolution of audience response technology.