Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2026
06:05
The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Performance-based measures: the early results are in
1National Committee for Quality Assurance, 2000 L St. NW, Suite 500, Washington, DC 20036, USA. okane@ncqa.org
Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy : JMCP
|March 8, 2007
Summary
Pay for performance (P4P) initiatives incentivize better healthcare delivery by rewarding quality care. While both financial and nonfinancial incentives drive change, the return on investment for these programs remains unknown.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Healthcare Management
- Quality Improvement
Background:
- Pay for performance (P4P) initiatives aim to enhance healthcare delivery and promote value-based care.
- These programs reward quality care and efficient resource utilization, reducing disproportionate spending.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the fundamental principles, design, and current practices of P4P initiatives.
- To analyze the results of P4P programs implemented in healthcare settings.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of P4P initiative designs and outcomes.
- Analysis of data from developmental P4P programs nationwide.
Main Results:
- Financial and nonfinancial incentives have shown potential to motivate significant changes in healthcare delivery.
- Key stakeholders driving P4P include employers, federal agencies, health plans, providers, and accreditors.
Conclusions:
- Measurement, transparency, and accountability are crucial for a value-based healthcare system.
- Organizations like the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) play a vital role in measuring and reporting healthcare quality.
- The long-term return on investment for P4P initiatives is not yet established.
