Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox...

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...

Randomized Experiments

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures from...

Bonferroni Test

Bonferroni Test

The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Multivariate one-sided multiple comparison procedure with a control based on the approximate likelihood ratio test.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2010

Same author

Development of sequential multiple comparison procedure for dose response test.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2007

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Step down procedure for comparing several treatments with a control based on multivariate normal response.

Tsunehisa Imada¹, Hideyuki Douke

¹Kumamoto Liberal Arts Education, Division of Liberal Arts Education, Kyushu Tokai University, 9-1-1 Toroku, Kumamoto 862-8652, Japan. timada@ktmail.ktokai-u.ac.jp

Biometrical Journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift

|March 9, 2007

Summary

This study introduces a new step-down procedure for comparing multiple treatments against a control in clinical trials with multivariate normal data. The method enhances statistical power for treatment comparisons.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Area of Science:

Biostatistics
Clinical Trial Design
Statistical Inference

Background:

Multiple comparisons are crucial in clinical trials to evaluate several treatments against a control.
Multivariate normal distributions are common in clinical trial data, requiring specialized statistical methods.
Existing methods for multiple comparisons may not always optimize statistical power.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop and evaluate a novel step-down procedure for multiple comparisons in clinical trials.
To enhance the statistical power of tests when comparing several treatments to a control group.
To compare the performance of the proposed procedure against existing methods.

Main Methods:

Construction of a step-down procedure based on Dunnett and Tamhane (1991).
Formulation of all-pairs power using recursive formulas from Hayter and Tamhane (1991) and Dunnett, Horn, and Vollandt (2001).
Comparison with Nakamura and Imada's (2005) single-step procedure using numerical examples.

Main Results:

The proposed step-down procedure demonstrates competitive or superior power in numerical examples.
The recursive formula provides an efficient way to calculate all-pairs power.
The study quantifies the power differences between the step-down and single-step procedures.

Conclusions:

The developed step-down procedure offers an effective approach for multiple treatment comparisons in clinical trials.
The findings provide valuable insights into optimizing statistical power in clinical trial analysis.
This method contributes to more robust and powerful clinical trial evaluations.