Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Technology assessment for the anesthesiologist.

J P Abenstein1

  • 1Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First Street, Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. abenstein.john@mayo.edu

Anesthesiology Clinics
|March 9, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Is BIS monitoring cost-effective?

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2009
Same author

Study regarding anesthesia outcomes cites outdated studies.

Anesthesia and analgesia·2004
Same author

Is physician anesthesia cost-effective?

Anesthesia and analgesia·2004
Same author

Communication technology: patient safety and the patient-physician relationship.

Mayo Clinic proceedings·2001
Same author

Ventilator alarm failure due to modification of the scavenging system.

Anesthesiology·2000
Same author

The incidence of artery puncture with central venous cannulation using a modified technique for detection and prevention of arterial cannulation.

Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia·1997
Same journal

Outpatient Anesthesia in 2026: Scaling Care, Advancing Safety, Shaping the Future.

Anesthesiology clinics·2026
Same journal

Ambulatory Anesthesia: How Far Can We Go?

Anesthesiology clinics·2026
Same journal

Perioperative Management of Patients on Medication for Opioid Use Disorder Undergoing Ambulatory Surgery: Clinical Considerations for Anesthesiologists.

Anesthesiology clinics·2026
Same journal

Applying the 2024 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines for Cardiac Evaluation and Managment of Patients Having Noncardiac Surgeries in an Ambulatory Setting.

Anesthesiology clinics·2026
Same journal

Comprehensive Review of Office-Based Anesthesia Safety 2026 for the Next Generation.

Anesthesiology clinics·2026
Same journal

A Contemporary Review on Health Care Disparities in Pediatric Ambulatory Anesthesia.

Anesthesiology clinics·2026
See all related articles

Implementing health technology assessment (HTA) aids decision-making for new medical technologies. This process evaluates effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and fiscal impact to ensure optimal patient care and organizational financial stability.

Area of Science:

  • Health Policy
  • Health Economics
  • Medical Technology Assessment

Background:

  • Rising healthcare costs in the US, exceeding 15% of GDP, are significantly driven by new medical technologies.
  • Effective decision-making regarding the adoption of new healthcare technologies is crucial for managing costs and ensuring quality care.
  • Health Technology Assessment (HTA) provides frameworks for evaluating new medical innovations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline a comprehensive approach for evaluating new medical technologies within healthcare organizations.
  • To emphasize the importance of both clinical effectiveness and fiscal responsibility in technology adoption.
  • To guide anesthesiology departments in utilizing HTA for optimal patient care and financial stability.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discusses classical HTA using randomized clinical trials and cost-effectiveness ratios (e.g., dollars per quality-adjusted life year).
  • Proposes a modified approach focusing on medical center impact: approval, efficacy, improved outcomes, and operational feasibility.
  • Includes fiscal analysis of acquisition, operation, patient volume, payer mix, and downstream financial consequences.

    • Main Results:

    • A structured HTA process should confirm a technology's effectiveness, positive patient impact, and fiscal/operational viability before adoption.
    • Post-implementation reviews are essential to validate anticipated outcomes, volumes, income, and expenses.
    • Refinement of the HTA process and consideration of technology abandonment are necessary if outcomes deviate significantly from expectations.

    Conclusions:

    • Adopting a rigorous HTA process ensures that new medical technologies align with patient care goals and organizational financial health.
    • The anesthesiology department plays a key role in medical technology adoption and should leverage HTA principles.
    • Continuous evaluation and adaptation of HTA processes are vital for sustained quality and financial stability in healthcare.