Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Appealing statistics.

Peter Donnelly1

  • 1University of Oxford.

Medicine, Science, and the Law
|March 10, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

In Regina v. Adams, DNA evidence suggested a 1 in 200 million chance of an innocent match. Peter Donnelly explained Bayes' theorem to the court, clarifying the statistical interpretation of this forensic evidence.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mammographic surveillance in breast cancer patients aged 50 years or older: a synopsis of the Mammo-50 RCT.

Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)·2026
Same author

Preventing premature deaths through polygenic risk scores.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Supporting women with adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy (SWEET): feasibility study of the HT&Me intervention.

European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society·2025
Same author

Improving outcomeS for Women diagnosed with early breast cancer through adhErence to adjuvant Endocrine Therapy (SWEET): study protocol for a pragmatic randomised control trial of a patient-centred intervention to improve adherence to endocrine therapy in early breast cancer.

Trials·2025
Same author

Quality of life and patient reported outcomes in the UK Mammo-50 randomised trial of annual versus less frequent mammographic surveillance in people with breast cancer aged 50 years and over.

Health and quality of life outcomes·2025
Same author

Annual versus less frequent mammographic surveillance in people with breast cancer aged 50 years and older in the UK (Mammo-50): a multicentre, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.

Lancet (London, England)·2025
Same journal

Diagnosing autism in adult forensic settings.

Medicine, science, and the law·2026
Same journal

Background asbestos fiber levels in autopsy lungs: Implications for forensic disease attribution in the post-ban era.

Medicine, science, and the law·2026
Same journal

Changing patterns in volatile substance abuse fatalities: A retrospective case series from Northern Australia.

Medicine, science, and the law·2026
Same journal

Integrity, objectivity, and the role of healthcare expert witnesses in the judicial system: An analysis of practice, Indonesian law, and a Foucauldian perspective.

Medicine, science, and the law·2026
Same journal

Post-mortem computed tomography findings of spinal column injuries in comparison to autopsy: A systematic review.

Medicine, science, and the law·2026
Same journal

How useful is the concept of trauma-informed practice in prisons?

Medicine, science, and the law·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Science
  • Probability Theory
  • Legal Applications of Statistics

Background:

  • DNA evidence presented a statistical likelihood of 1 in 200 million for an innocent match in Regina v. Adams [1996].
  • The interpretation of complex statistical evidence in legal settings poses significant challenges for judges and juries.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To detail the involvement of statistician Peter Donnelly in the Regina v. Adams case.
  • To illustrate the application and explanation of Bayes' theorem in a real-world legal context.
  • To enhance understanding of how statistical probability is communicated in court.

Main Methods:

  • The abstract describes Peter Donnelly's role in explaining statistical concepts to the court.
  • It highlights the use of Bayes' theorem as a tool for interpreting DNA evidence probability.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The case involved highly persuasive DNA evidence with a low probability of coincidental match.
  • Bayes' theorem was employed to clarify the statistical significance of the DNA evidence for the judge and jury.

Conclusions:

  • Effective communication of statistical principles, such as Bayes' theorem, is crucial for the accurate evaluation of forensic evidence in legal proceedings.
  • The case underscores the importance of statistical expertise in the courtroom to ensure fair and informed judgments.