Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2026

09:35
Subcutaneous Trigeminal Nerve Field Stimulation for Refractory Facial Pain
Published on: May 10, 2017
Trigeminal small-fibre function assessed with contact heat evoked potentials in humans
A Truini1, F Galeotti, E Pennisi
1Department of Neurological Sciences, La Sapienza University, Viale Università 30, 00185 Rome, Italy. andrea.truini@uniroma1.it
Pain
|March 10, 2007
Summary
Contact heat stimuli can evoke brain potentials (CHEPs) and nociceptive reflexes, proving useful for diagnosing facial neuropathic pain. However, CHEPs are not suitable for recording C-fiber potentials.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Pain Research
- Neurology
Background:
- Contact heat stimuli are known to activate mechano-thermal nociceptors and elicit brain potentials (CHEPs) from the limbs.
- The trigeminal territory's response to contact heat and its diagnostic potential for facial neuropathic pain remain less explored.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the reproducibility of contact heat-evoked potentials (CHEPs) in the trigeminal territory.
- To assess the reliability of CHEPs as a diagnostic tool for facial neuropathic pain.
- To compare CHEPs with laser-evoked potentials (LEPs).
Main Methods:
- Contact heat stimuli were applied to the perioral and supraorbital regions in healthy controls and patients with facial neuropathic pain.
- Contact heat-evoked potentials (CHEPs) were recorded from the vertex.
- Reflex responses from orbicularis oculi and masticatory muscles were also recorded.
- Correlations between CHEP data, pain ratings, stimulation site, and age were analyzed.
Main Results:
- Contact heat stimuli (51°C) evoked vertex potentials (NP complex) with longer latency than laser pulses.
- Perioral stimulation resulted in higher pain ratings and more robust CHEPs compared to supraorbital stimulation.
- CHEPs correlated significantly with age.
- Contact heat stimuli (53°C) elicited nociceptive reflexes (orbicularis oculi response, masseter silent period).
- In patients, CHEP abnormalities mirrored those observed with LEPs.
- Reproducible C-fiber potentials were not obtained with contact heat stimuli at 41°C.
Conclusions:
- Contact heat stimulation effectively evokes brain potentials and nociceptive reflexes related to Adelta fiber input.
- CHEPs show promise as a diagnostic tool for facial neuropathic pain, with abnormalities paralleling LEPs.
- Contact heat stimulation is not suitable for recording C-fiber potentials.
Related Concept Videos
Thermosensation
Peripheral thermosensation is the perception of external temperature. A change in temperature (on the surface of the skin and other tissues) is detected by a family of temperature-sensitive ion channels called Transient Receptor Potential, or TRP, receptors. These receptors are located on free nerve endings. Those detecting cold temperatures are closer to the surface of the skin than the nerve endings detecting warmth. These thermoTRP channels, while temperature selective, have relatively...
Local Anesthetics: Differential Sensitivity of Nerve Fibers
Local anesthetics (LAs) block the sodium channels of nerve trunks, sensory nerve endings, and neuromuscular junctions. Although LAs can block all kinds of nerves, the sensitivity of nerve fibers differs according to nerve types and structures. LAs are known to block myelinated fibers faster than unmyelinated ones. Also, they block pain or sensory neurons at low concentrations without affecting the motor neurons involved in muscle contractions. This helps relieve labor pain without affecting the...

