Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Masking and Demasking Agents

Masking and Demasking Agents

EDTA titrations may necessitate masking and demasking agents to temporarily protect a particular metal ion in a mixture from the EDTA reaction. These agents facilitate the sequential analysis of the metal ions by forming stable complexes with some—but not all—metal ions during certain steps.
There are many masking agents, such as cyanide, fluoride, triethanolamine, thiourea, and 2,3-bis(sulfanyl)propan-1-ol (formerly 2,3-dimercapto-1-propanol), with the masking agent chosen based on the metal...

Variability: Analysis

Variability: Analysis

Measures of variability are statistical metrics that reveal the dispersion pattern within a dataset. They are pivotal in biostatistics, providing insights into the heterogeneity within health and biological data. Variability signifies the degree to which data points diverge from one another, helping researchers understand the potential range of values and associated uncertainty within the data.
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...

Interference: Path Lengths

Interference: Path Lengths

Consider two sources of sound, that may or may not be in phase, emitting waves at a single frequency, and consider the frequencies to be the same.
Two special sources may be considered when they are in phase. This can be easily achieved by feeding the two sources from the same source. An example would be synchronizing the two speakers by feeding them with the same source, such as the sound waves produced by a tuning fork. This setup ensures that the two sources have the same frequency and are...

Facial Feedback Hypothesis

Facial Feedback Hypothesis

Charles Darwin proposed that facial expressions are an evolutionary adaptation for communication. He argued that these expressions are not influenced by culture but are universal across species. For example, a snarling expression with exposed teeth signals a threat in many animals, including humans. Darwin also suggested that displaying an emotion can intensify the feeling. Smiling, for example, could enhance one's sense of happiness. This idea laid the foundation for understanding the role of...

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...

Uncertainty: Overview

Uncertainty: Overview

In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

The relationship between foveal anatomy and retinal function in oculocutaneous albinism.

Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology·2026

Same author

How Listening to and Remembering Accented and Non-Accented Speech Influences Walking Mechanics.

Ear and hearing·2026

Same author

Attention modulates the cortical representation of speech sounds in the spatial release from informational masking.

Auditory perception & cognition·2026

Same author

Testing a dominance-region hypothesis for interaural time discrimination using off-frequency maskers.

JASA express letters·2026

Same author

GenAI-Based Digital Twins Aided Data Augmentation Increases Accuracy in Real-Time Cokurtosis-Based Anomaly Detection of Wearable Data.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2025

Same author

Towards verifiable cancer digital twins: tissue level modeling protocol for precision medicine.

Frontiers in physiology·2024

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Memorization-Based Training and Testing Paradigm for Robust Vocal Identity Recognition in Expressive Speech Using Event-Related Potentials Analysis

Memorization-Based Training and Testing Paradigm for Robust Vocal Identity Recognition in Expressive Speech Using Event-Related Potentials Analysis

Published on: August 9, 2024

Variability and uncertainty in masking by competing speech.

Richard L Freyman¹, Karen S Helfer, Uma Balakrishnan

¹Department of Communication Disorders, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, USA. rlf@comdis.umass.edu

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

|March 14, 2007

Summary

Uncertainty in speech masking was explored. Spatial separation of sounds reduced variability in speech recognition, suggesting informational masking is less effective when sounds originate from different locations.

More Related Videos

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms

Published on: February 10, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Memorization-Based Training and Testing Paradigm for Robust Vocal Identity Recognition in Expressive Speech Using Event-Related Potentials Analysis

Memorization-Based Training and Testing Paradigm for Robust Vocal Identity Recognition in Expressive Speech Using Event-Related Potentials Analysis

Published on: August 9, 2024

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms

Published on: February 10, 2016

Area of Science:

Auditory perception
Speech processing
Psychoacoustics

Background:

Masking of speech by interfering speech is a significant challenge in auditory perception.
Informational masking, arising from masker characteristics rather than acoustic overlap, plays a crucial role.
Understanding the influence of uncertainty on speech masking is vital for auditory models.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the impact of masker uncertainty on speech recognition in the presence of interfering speech.
To determine if spatial separation of auditory stimuli mitigates the effects of informational masking and uncertainty.

Main Methods:

Participants performed speech recognition tasks using nonsense sentences as targets.
Masking was achieved using concurrent speech from multiple female talkers.
Stimuli were presented in nonspatial (co-located) and spatial (temporally offset) conditions.
Experiment 2 manipulated masker uncertainty by randomizing or fixing masker tokens and signal-to-noise ratios across trials.

Main Results:

Speech recognition performance varied significantly across different maskers in the nonspatial condition.
Spatial presentation of the masker reduced performance variability, indicating reduced impact of informational masking.
Manipulating masker uncertainty across trials had minimal effects on speech recognition performance in both spatial and nonspatial conditions.

Conclusions:

Spatial separation of speech maskers can reduce the impact of informational masking, leading to more consistent speech recognition.
Masker uncertainty does not appear to be a primary driver of performance variability in speech masking scenarios.
Findings contribute to understanding the complex interplay between spatial cues, masker characteristics, and uncertainty in speech perception.